Selective predators in complex communities – mechanisms and consequences of benthic fish predation in small temperate streams

• Main Author: Worischka, Susanne
• Other Authors: Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät Umweltwissenschaften
• Format: Doctoral Thesis
• Language: English
• Published: Saechsische Landesbibliothek- Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Dresden 2015
• Subjects: Limnologie; Nahrungsnetze; Fließgewässer; benthivore Fische; Prädation; Makrozoobenthos; streams; food webs; benthivorous fish; predation; macroinvertebrates; ddc:550; rvk:RB 10513
• Online Access: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-170972; http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-170972; http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/17097/Dissertation_Worischka_2014.pdf; http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/17097/Dissertation_Worischka_2015_Appendix.pdf

The prey consumption by benthivorous fish predators can have profound top-down effects in stream food webs. To analyse this effects in small temperate stream ecosystems, a long-term field experiment was conducted in two streams in South-eastern Germany, Gauernitzbach and Tännichtgrundbach, from 2004 to 2011. The densities of two small-bodied benthivorous fish species, gudgeon (Gobio gobio) and stone loach (Barbatula barbatula), were manipulated following a Before-After-Control-Impact design. The top predator regime affected the benthic community composition of the streams mainly in pools, whereas the total benthic invertebrate biomass was not affected in any mesohabitat. The present work describes a causal analysis of the observed food web effects using additional field analyses and laboratory experiments, with a special focus on the habitat use and foraging behaviour of the fish as top predators. The probably most important of the analysed mechanisms was mesohabitat-specific predation by the fish. Three 24-h field video surveys combined with benthic invertebrate sampling showed that constraints in habitat use, especially for gudgeon, induced a differential predator-prey habitat overlap which resulted in a higher predation risk for the invertebrate prey in pools than in riffles. Another important mechanism was selective predation of both fish species. Their prey selectivity was largely explained by a small number of prey variables being connected to the partly non-visual foraging mode of these benthic predators. Besides the traits body size and feeding type, long-term mean abundance played a central role, small and highly abundant invertebrates, grazers and sediment feeders being preferred by gudgeon and stone loach. The preference for small and abundant prey taxa (chironomids) exceeded purely opportunistic feeding and probably facilitated resource partitioning between the two fish species having very similar diets. In addition to active selectivity, different predator avoidance strategies of the invertebrates analysed in laboratory experiments explained the passive selectivity of the fish predators for certain prey taxa in the streams. This could be shown for two abundant taxa being consumed by the fish predators in very different quantities, Gammarus pulex and Hydropsyche instabilis. These three mechanisms, although probably interacting with several other factors, could explain a large part of the effects the top-down food web manipulation had on the benthic community, especially the observed high degree of mesohabitat and species specificity. Confirming this, quantitative characteristics of predation food webs, for instance the importance of intraguild predation, differed markedly between pool and riffle mesohabitats. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the benthivorous fish affected benthic community structure mainly by mesohabitat-specific and selective predation. A manipulation of this (native) top predator type therefore will probably have such rather subtle but not catastrophic consequences in ecosystems with a high biotic diversity and a rich natural habitat structure and connectivity.