Institutional Reflexivity

How can we understand the innovativeness of firms or organizations in general, and how should we assess it in terms of nontechnological innovation? My paper deals with these two questions. The “ability” of companies to adapt to new circumstances, to create new products, processes and new knowledge,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moldaschl, Manfred F.
Language:English
Published: Technische Universität Chemnitz 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-200701809
https://monarch.qucosa.de/id/qucosa%3A18818
https://monarch.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A18818/attachment/ATT-0/
https://monarch.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A18818/attachment/ATT-1/
id ndltd-DRESDEN-oai-qucosa-de-qucosa-18818
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-DRESDEN-oai-qucosa-de-qucosa-188182020-11-18T05:10:44Z Institutional Reflexivity urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-200701809 eng How can we understand the innovativeness of firms or organizations in general, and how should we assess it in terms of nontechnological innovation? My paper deals with these two questions. The “ability” of companies to adapt to new circumstances, to create new products, processes and new knowledge, has been conceptualized in many approaches. Some of them simply define a list of “(critical) success factors” or “(key) performance indica-tors”, as tools for ranking and evaluation, without any theoretical reference. Others, like the resource-based or capability-based approach(es), work with theoretical references, but are still very weak in operationalizing of what they call “capability”. My paper gives a critical description of this situation and offers a new proposal to classify and to measure the “inclination” of organizations to innovate in all dimensions. This proposal roots in pragmatistic thinking as represented in the theory of reflexive modernization and in the pragmatist version of organizational learning theory. Empirically, it has been applied merely in case studies yet. A survey project is in preparation. Institutional Reflexivity Absorptive Capacity Competence-Based View Dynamic Capabilities info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/330 ddc:330 Innovationsbereitschaft Innovationspotenzial Moldaschl, Manfred F. Technische Universität Chemnitz info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion 2007-11-19 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess doc-type:preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint doc-type:Text https://monarch.qucosa.de/id/qucosa%3A18818 https://monarch.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A18818/attachment/ATT-0/ https://monarch.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A18818/attachment/ATT-1/
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Institutional Reflexivity
Absorptive Capacity
Competence-Based View
Dynamic Capabilities
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/330
ddc:330
Innovationsbereitschaft
Innovationspotenzial
spellingShingle Institutional Reflexivity
Absorptive Capacity
Competence-Based View
Dynamic Capabilities
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/330
ddc:330
Innovationsbereitschaft
Innovationspotenzial
Moldaschl, Manfred F.
Institutional Reflexivity
description How can we understand the innovativeness of firms or organizations in general, and how should we assess it in terms of nontechnological innovation? My paper deals with these two questions. The “ability” of companies to adapt to new circumstances, to create new products, processes and new knowledge, has been conceptualized in many approaches. Some of them simply define a list of “(critical) success factors” or “(key) performance indica-tors”, as tools for ranking and evaluation, without any theoretical reference. Others, like the resource-based or capability-based approach(es), work with theoretical references, but are still very weak in operationalizing of what they call “capability”. My paper gives a critical description of this situation and offers a new proposal to classify and to measure the “inclination” of organizations to innovate in all dimensions. This proposal roots in pragmatistic thinking as represented in the theory of reflexive modernization and in the pragmatist version of organizational learning theory. Empirically, it has been applied merely in case studies yet. A survey project is in preparation.
author Moldaschl, Manfred F.
author_facet Moldaschl, Manfred F.
author_sort Moldaschl, Manfred F.
title Institutional Reflexivity
title_short Institutional Reflexivity
title_full Institutional Reflexivity
title_fullStr Institutional Reflexivity
title_full_unstemmed Institutional Reflexivity
title_sort institutional reflexivity
publisher Technische Universität Chemnitz
publishDate 2007
url http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-200701809
https://monarch.qucosa.de/id/qucosa%3A18818
https://monarch.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A18818/attachment/ATT-0/
https://monarch.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A18818/attachment/ATT-1/
work_keys_str_mv AT moldaschlmanfredf institutionalreflexivity
_version_ 1719357811345850368