| Summary: | My research addresses the question of' 'how does the institutional context impact on
the individual t'raming of' strategic issuesT These early stages of' decision making
represent an important area of study, setting the t'Oundations t'Or the latter stages of
decision-making. I show that although both the problem formulation and strategic
issue diagnosis literatures have increased our understanding of these formative stages,
neither has adequately addressed how 'Institutional forces' impact on the individual
fi-aming of strategic issues. My research applies an institutional perspective, drawing
on Barley & Tolbert (1997) and their work on 'scripted behaviours' to address this.
Institutional i sts highlight the institutional context, represented by powerful social and
symbolic fOrces that influence organisations, their practices and behaviours of
individual actors through the enactment of scripts.
A naturalistic approach, incorporating the use of semi-structured interviews was
applied. Respondents were drawn from two universities: Alpha & Beta, possessing
membership of' multiple institutions: academia and law, academia and accountancy.
So, the research sought to understand the role of multiple institutions on the framing
of strategic issues.
It was established that scripts are widely shared within the institutional settings,
playing a pivotal role in the framing of strategic issues (representative of top-down
institutional processes being at play) but do not operate in isolation. I draw on the
work of Bartunek ( 1984) to further ground the second inter-related concept described
in my thesis as 'meanings'. These enable respondents to interpret institutionally
defined scripts, indicative of bottom-up institutional processes also being at play.
Several contributions are made, firstly to the strategic issue and problem formulation
literatures and secondly to the institutional literature by focusing on micro-
institutional processes.
|
|---|
