Can We Really Claim ‘Full Responsibility’? The Problem With Normative Luck Egalitarianism in a Luck-Pervasive World
In the last four decades, luck egalitarianism has emerged as a hotly debated theory of distributive justice. The tenet, in its most normative sense, calls for distribution or assistance when circumstances of disadvantage arise from bad luck that is independent of human influence. Disadvantages that...
Main Author: | Ho, Emilie |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Scholarship @ Claremont
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/824 http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1908&context=scripps_theses |
Similar Items
-
Costly choices: gender and luck egalitarianism
by: Byrnes, Emma
Published: (2016) -
Why Luck Egalitarianism Fails in Condemning Oppression
by: Cynthia A. Stark
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Luck egalitarianism and educational equality.
by: Calvert, John Sinclair
Published: (2015) -
Immigrants, Multiculturalism, and Expensive Cultural Tastes: Quong on Luck Egalitarianism and Cultural Minority Rights
by: Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen
Published: (2011-11-01) -
Luck and the Limits of Equality
by: Jeffers, Matthew
Published: (2017)