Time to Get Real: A Food Assessment of Dining at Pomona College

Pomona College is an institution deeply committed to sustainability and student well being; however these commitments are not reflected in the College’s food purchases. Before this study, an assessment of purchasing had not been conducted at Pomona College. Using the Real Food Calculator – a metric...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Meyer, Samantha
Format: Others
Published: Scholarship @ Claremont 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses/8
http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=pomona_theses
id ndltd-CLAREMONT-oai-scholarship.claremont.edu-pomona_theses-1007
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-CLAREMONT-oai-scholarship.claremont.edu-pomona_theses-10072013-04-19T14:37:44Z Time to Get Real: A Food Assessment of Dining at Pomona College Meyer, Samantha Pomona College is an institution deeply committed to sustainability and student well being; however these commitments are not reflected in the College’s food purchases. Before this study, an assessment of purchasing had not been conducted at Pomona College. Using the Real Food Calculator – a metric designed to evaluate food purchasing at academic institutions – I tracked all food purchased by one of the College’s dining halls over the course of one month. Each food item was assessed based on the potential health concerns of its ingredients and whether the item was locally produced, ecologically sound and/or humane to determine whether it should be considered Real. The assessment metric also lists ingredients with potential health concerns (including trans fats, high fructose corn syrup, MSG, and others), which if present in the food item mean it cannot be considered Real. Of the over $150,000 worth of food purchases made during the study, 8.9% qualified as Real Food. Each food that qualified as Real Food met the standards for at least one of the attributes (local, ecologically sound, or humane). A total of 2.1% of all food purchases qualified for two attributes. Of the foods assessed, over one third contained ingredients considered harmful to human health. If Pomona is serious about its commitments to sustainability and student well being, it is time to include food purchasing in these discussions. The study concludes with a series of recommendations to improve food purchasing at Pomona College. 2010-05-01 text application/pdf http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses/8 http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=pomona_theses © 2011 Samantha Meyer Pomona Senior Theses Scholarship @ Claremont Sustainable food College food procurement Local foods Organic farming Fair trade Animal welfare College students - Nutrition Sustainability
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Sustainable food
College food procurement
Local foods
Organic farming
Fair trade
Animal welfare
College students - Nutrition
Sustainability
spellingShingle Sustainable food
College food procurement
Local foods
Organic farming
Fair trade
Animal welfare
College students - Nutrition
Sustainability
Meyer, Samantha
Time to Get Real: A Food Assessment of Dining at Pomona College
description Pomona College is an institution deeply committed to sustainability and student well being; however these commitments are not reflected in the College’s food purchases. Before this study, an assessment of purchasing had not been conducted at Pomona College. Using the Real Food Calculator – a metric designed to evaluate food purchasing at academic institutions – I tracked all food purchased by one of the College’s dining halls over the course of one month. Each food item was assessed based on the potential health concerns of its ingredients and whether the item was locally produced, ecologically sound and/or humane to determine whether it should be considered Real. The assessment metric also lists ingredients with potential health concerns (including trans fats, high fructose corn syrup, MSG, and others), which if present in the food item mean it cannot be considered Real. Of the over $150,000 worth of food purchases made during the study, 8.9% qualified as Real Food. Each food that qualified as Real Food met the standards for at least one of the attributes (local, ecologically sound, or humane). A total of 2.1% of all food purchases qualified for two attributes. Of the foods assessed, over one third contained ingredients considered harmful to human health. If Pomona is serious about its commitments to sustainability and student well being, it is time to include food purchasing in these discussions. The study concludes with a series of recommendations to improve food purchasing at Pomona College.
author Meyer, Samantha
author_facet Meyer, Samantha
author_sort Meyer, Samantha
title Time to Get Real: A Food Assessment of Dining at Pomona College
title_short Time to Get Real: A Food Assessment of Dining at Pomona College
title_full Time to Get Real: A Food Assessment of Dining at Pomona College
title_fullStr Time to Get Real: A Food Assessment of Dining at Pomona College
title_full_unstemmed Time to Get Real: A Food Assessment of Dining at Pomona College
title_sort time to get real: a food assessment of dining at pomona college
publisher Scholarship @ Claremont
publishDate 2010
url http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses/8
http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=pomona_theses
work_keys_str_mv AT meyersamantha timetogetrealafoodassessmentofdiningatpomonacollege
_version_ 1716581105050583040