Untangling the Role of Brand Affect and Brand Trust in Marketing Research

Current marketing research suggests that two separate cognitive functions, rational "brand trust" and emotional "brand affect", work independently to influence brand loyalty and in turn, consumer purchasing. Yet, this idea is at off with a growing body of neuroeconomic research,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Coleman, Megan K
Format: Others
Published: Scholarship @ Claremont 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/994
http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2094&context=cmc_theses
id ndltd-CLAREMONT-oai-scholarship.claremont.edu-cmc_theses-2094
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-CLAREMONT-oai-scholarship.claremont.edu-cmc_theses-20942015-01-21T03:28:45Z Untangling the Role of Brand Affect and Brand Trust in Marketing Research Coleman, Megan K Current marketing research suggests that two separate cognitive functions, rational "brand trust" and emotional "brand affect", work independently to influence brand loyalty and in turn, consumer purchasing. Yet, this idea is at off with a growing body of neuroeconomic research, which demonstrates the role of emotion in seemingly rational decisions.Here, we examine psychological, economic, and neuroscientrific research on how, along with the stand-alone effects of brand affect, emotion may influence brand trust, illustrating how these two seemingly separate functions may work in conjunction. First, we use psychological and economic theories such as the Somatic Marker Hypothesis, Affect-as-Information Theory, and Appraisal Tendency Theory to demonstrate that emotions have a large role in decision-making. Next we describe views from behavioral economics on how human decision-makers respond to uncertainty, drawing on frameworks, such as Prospect Theory and experimental findings like the Ellsberg paradox. Experimental findings suggest that people find the unknown emotionally aversive, both for uncertainty in outcomes (risk) and the range of possible outcomes (ambiguity). Risk- and ambiguity-aversion appear to arise from separate neural systems, suggesting that brand trust can increase affect by decreasing both perceived ambiguity and risk. Finally, we examine the marketing implications of the conclusion that affect and trust are interconnected. With the new perspective gained, marketers can better understand the mutually dependent relationship of brand affect and brand trust and begin to examine ways to capitalize on the clarification. 2015-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/994 http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2094&context=cmc_theses © 2014 Megan K. Coleman CMC Senior Theses Scholarship @ Claremont Brand Affect Brand Trust Emotion Risk Ambiguity Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Brand Affect
Brand Trust
Emotion
Risk
Ambiguity
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
spellingShingle Brand Affect
Brand Trust
Emotion
Risk
Ambiguity
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
Coleman, Megan K
Untangling the Role of Brand Affect and Brand Trust in Marketing Research
description Current marketing research suggests that two separate cognitive functions, rational "brand trust" and emotional "brand affect", work independently to influence brand loyalty and in turn, consumer purchasing. Yet, this idea is at off with a growing body of neuroeconomic research, which demonstrates the role of emotion in seemingly rational decisions.Here, we examine psychological, economic, and neuroscientrific research on how, along with the stand-alone effects of brand affect, emotion may influence brand trust, illustrating how these two seemingly separate functions may work in conjunction. First, we use psychological and economic theories such as the Somatic Marker Hypothesis, Affect-as-Information Theory, and Appraisal Tendency Theory to demonstrate that emotions have a large role in decision-making. Next we describe views from behavioral economics on how human decision-makers respond to uncertainty, drawing on frameworks, such as Prospect Theory and experimental findings like the Ellsberg paradox. Experimental findings suggest that people find the unknown emotionally aversive, both for uncertainty in outcomes (risk) and the range of possible outcomes (ambiguity). Risk- and ambiguity-aversion appear to arise from separate neural systems, suggesting that brand trust can increase affect by decreasing both perceived ambiguity and risk. Finally, we examine the marketing implications of the conclusion that affect and trust are interconnected. With the new perspective gained, marketers can better understand the mutually dependent relationship of brand affect and brand trust and begin to examine ways to capitalize on the clarification.
author Coleman, Megan K
author_facet Coleman, Megan K
author_sort Coleman, Megan K
title Untangling the Role of Brand Affect and Brand Trust in Marketing Research
title_short Untangling the Role of Brand Affect and Brand Trust in Marketing Research
title_full Untangling the Role of Brand Affect and Brand Trust in Marketing Research
title_fullStr Untangling the Role of Brand Affect and Brand Trust in Marketing Research
title_full_unstemmed Untangling the Role of Brand Affect and Brand Trust in Marketing Research
title_sort untangling the role of brand affect and brand trust in marketing research
publisher Scholarship @ Claremont
publishDate 2015
url http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/994
http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2094&context=cmc_theses
work_keys_str_mv AT colemanmegank untanglingtheroleofbrandaffectandbrandtrustinmarketingresearch
_version_ 1716728197488312320