| Summary: | 本研究之目的在於瞭解國民小學學生網路使用行為與網路閱讀素養之關係，採問卷調查法收集研究資料，以全臺灣各縣市之國民小學高年級學生為研究母群，進行分層隨機抽樣，共取得有效樣本1182人。
研究工具採用「網路使用行為問卷」、「網路閱讀素養問卷」，並以t 檢定、Pearson積差相關、迴歸分析等方法進行研究資料分析，最後以結構方程式模型建立網路使用行為與網路閱讀素養模型，研究結果如下：
一、性別在資訊瀏覽與搜尋活動、線上遊戲活動方面達顯著差異。
二、性別在整體網路閱讀素養上無顯著差異。
三、年級在訊瀏覽與搜尋活動、社群活動方面達顯著差異，在線上遊戲上無顯著差
異。
四、年級在整體網路閱讀素養上達顯著差異，六年級優於五年級。
五、結構方程式模型檢定資訊瀏覽與搜尋活動、線上遊戲活動對國小學生網路閱
讀素養有顯著的影響。
六、資訊瀏覽與搜尋活動能正向預測網路閱讀素養，線上遊戲對網路閱讀素養有
負向影響，社群活動對網路閱讀素養無顯著影響。
最後，根據研究結果提出各項建議，以供教學實務上及未來參考。
=== This research aims to reveal the relationship between internet usage behavior and internet reading literacy of elementary school students.
This study used a questionnaire survey method to collect data. The subjects were collected from the elementary school students in 2011 by the stratified random sampling. The total valid samples were 1182. The research instruments used in this study included "Internet Usage Behavior Questionnaire", and "Internet Reading literacy Questionnaire ". Meanwhile, the collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistic, the t-test and Pearson correlation and regression analysis. Lastly, data were analyzed with Internet Usage Behavior and Internet Reading Literacy by structural equation modeling. The main findings were as follows:
1.There existed gender differences on information browsing and search activities and online game.
2.There existed no gender differences on internet reading literacy.
3.There existed grade differences on information browsing and search activities, community activities, and no grade differences on online game.
4.There existed grade differences on internet reading literacy with girls performed better than boys.
5.Structural equation modeling (SEM) showed that information browsing and search activities and online game activities had a remarkable influence on the internet reading literacy of elementary school students.
6.The study had found that information browsing and search activities have a positive effect upon internet reading literacy, and online game have a negative effect upon internet reading literacy. Community activities had no influence on the internet reading literacy.
Finally, according to the findings, implications and suggestions for teaching and future researches were discussed and proposed.
|
|---|
