胡錦濤時期的文化外交政策研究

文化外交是近年來國際關係中的一項重要議題,各國皆對外輸出軟權力來增加該國在世界上的影響力,中國自改革開放後經濟與軍事能力大幅成長,因此近年來便開始加強對外文化輸出的工作,運用文化外交的力量以達到國家政策的目標。 本研究的目的在於對胡錦濤主政時期的文化外交政策做一全面性的認識,論文首先探討文化外交的理論淵源,進而建構出文化外交的意涵;其次從總體的角度來研究胡錦濤政府文化外交政策,包括其產生原因以及訴求,並對執行此政策的各相關機構與指導方針做分析。另外在具體實踐方面,論文從孔子學院及2008年北京奧運來探討中國文化外交政策的成效,最後針對這兩項實踐以及總體文化外交政策做深入的評估...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: 歐陽群, Ouyang, Chun
Language:中文
Published: 國立政治大學
Subjects:
Online Access:http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0952530051%22.
Description
Summary:文化外交是近年來國際關係中的一項重要議題,各國皆對外輸出軟權力來增加該國在世界上的影響力,中國自改革開放後經濟與軍事能力大幅成長,因此近年來便開始加強對外文化輸出的工作,運用文化外交的力量以達到國家政策的目標。 本研究的目的在於對胡錦濤主政時期的文化外交政策做一全面性的認識,論文首先探討文化外交的理論淵源,進而建構出文化外交的意涵;其次從總體的角度來研究胡錦濤政府文化外交政策,包括其產生原因以及訴求,並對執行此政策的各相關機構與指導方針做分析。另外在具體實踐方面,論文從孔子學院及2008年北京奧運來探討中國文化外交政策的成效,最後針對這兩項實踐以及總體文化外交政策做深入的評估。 研究發現中國的文化外交政策之興起有其內、外在環境的影響,而執行的結果雖然有達到一定的成效,但受限於部份因素的制約,使得中國的文化外交政策仍有許多待改進之處。 === Cultural diplomacy is an important issue in international relations in recent years; many countries output their soft power to increase their influences in the world. Since the success of China’s reform and open policy, its economy and military power had a large growth. Therefore, China started to strengthen the policy of cultural output, using the power of cultural diplomacy to achieve its national goal. The purpose of this research is to have a comprehensive understanding on the cultural diplomacy during Hu Jintao’s administration. In the beginning of this research, we discuss the theories of cultural diplomacy, and then to describe it’s meaning. Secondly, we analyze this policy, including the background and purpose, from the overall viewpoint, and also study on the government departments and documents related to this policy. In addition, we take Confucius Institute and Beijing Olympic Games for examples to discuss the result of China’s cultural diplomacy. At last, this research has the analysis on these two practices and the policy. This research found that the appearance of China’s cultural diplomacy is influenced by the inner and outer environments. Although this policy has its result, it is still restricted by some factors. It means there are still many places of this policy need to be improved.