| Summary: | 臺灣總督府檔案是臺灣歷史相當重要的一部檔案全宗。西元1895-1945年，臺灣受日本統治，對臺灣的歷史、政治、經濟、文化等產生重要影響。臺灣總督府是日治時期臺灣最高行政機構，所留存的公文檔案，正可以作為後人研究當時統治作為的第一手資料。如何整理檔案俾利使用，是為重要的課題。檔案整理並提供利用，主要透過兩種程序：編排與描述。亦即為本研究所關注的焦點。
本研究採用「文獻分析法」、「歷史研究法」與「深度訪談法」進行研究，在文獻蒐集上，主要針對國內關於臺灣總督府檔案分類與編排描述、各種臺灣總督府檔案檢索工具等相關資料進行蒐集；在歷史研究上，是將蒐集到的歷史文獻加以整理分析，探究檔案原始編排描述狀況以及文書處理法令與分類之更嬗；另透過深度訪談，了解檔案管理機構在進行編排描述時，所遭遇的問題及實際狀況，以補文獻之不足。
根據本研究，有下列結論：一、臺灣總督府檔案之實體編排順序係依文獻館所編冊號；二、臺灣總督府檔案之分類及控制層級，副全宗部分係以人為判定，其下各層級如門、類等則依文書處理規程相關規定；三、數位典藏計畫設立諸多新創層級與不同分類方式；四、現存目錄中，以「臺灣總督府文書目錄」與「典藏數位化查詢－日據時期與光復初期檔案整合查詢」最為詳盡，惟該項編目工作費時良久，二目錄均未完竣；五、各種目錄之編目規則各行其是。
最後對前述研究結論提出建議：一、統一臺灣總督府檔案之分類、控制層級與用詞；二、確實進行檔案清查與登錄工作；三、描述檔案可先著錄至案卷層級，或者先著錄主要欄位，日後再予以補充，俾早日提供利用；四、增加著錄件以外各控制層級之資料；五、擴大數位典藏參與學域，廣納檔案學、歷史學人才；六、整合各檢索工具；七、建立檔案編目規則，以供各單位編目之參考依據；八、機關在文書製作時期，即依檔案學控制層級進行歸類。
=== The Taiwan Soutokufu Archives are important archive fonds in Taiwan history. During 1895 to 1945, Japan governed Taiwan and materially influenced the history, politics, economy, and culture of Taiwan. Because the Taiwan Soutokufu is the main administration authority during the Japanese colonial period, its archives would be the first hand sources for the research regarding to the act of state during the Japanese colonial period. Therefore, it is an important topic to understand how the archives were arranged to utilize. The archives are arranged to utilize by means of the arrangement and the description, which are also the focus of the essay.
The research methods of the essay are “literature review,” “historical research,” and “in-depth interview.” I mainly searched and collected the classification, the arrangement and description of the Taiwan Soutokufu Archives to search and collect the documents. I arranged and analyzed the collected documents to understand the status of the original arrangements of the archives and the change of the law and classification of the documentary arrangement. To supplement the short of the documents, by means of in-depth interview, I could realize the actual problems and situation which happened while the archives administration institutions arrange and describe the archives.
I have made the following conclusions in the essay. First, the substantial arrangement order of the Taiwan Soutokufu Archives are the volume number of the Taiwan Historica. Second, the arrangements, control levels, and sub-fonds of the Taiwan Soutokufu Archives are determined by Taiwan Historica and the sub levels, are determined by the rules of documentary arrangement. Third, there are many innovative and different methods of the classification in NDAP, National Digital Archives Program. Forth, the “Documentary Index of Taiwan Soutokufu” and the “Digital Japanese Ruling and Postwar Archives Project of Taiwan Historica” are the most complete in the existing indexes. However, the work of arranging the two indexes drains on lots of time and the two indexes have not been accomplished. Fifth, each one of the rules to arrange the index is totally different.
After all, I have made the suggestion upon the forgoing conclusions. First, the classification, control levels and vocabulary should be unified. Second, archieves should be checked and registered authentically. Third, the description of the archives could be initiated in the file folders level or main entry. Forth, the retrieval system should also contain the documents of the control level except the items. Sixth, the finding aids should be coordinated. Seventh, the rules of the arrangement of the archives should be set up. Eighth, the institutions should classify the records by the means of control levels of the archives while they produce the records.
|
|---|
