| Summary: | 本研究旨在探究特殊教育學校圖書館的建置情況、館藏資源、特殊教育教師使用情形與滿意度情形。
本研究採用問卷調查法，將問卷分為兩大部分，第一部分為特殊教育學校圖書館之館藏資源建置情況，研究對象為全臺灣28所特殊學校圖書館負責人，問卷內容包含學校基本資料、組織人力、館藏資源與經費、營運管理情形、閱讀推動與利用教育及困難與需求，總計回收有效問卷24份；第二部分為特殊教育學校教師使用學校圖書館之情形與滿意度調查，研究對象為特殊學校國中部及高職部之正式特教老師，問卷內容包含教師個人基本資料、教師使用學校圖書館情形及其對於學校圖書館的滿意度，總計回收有效問卷458份。兩份問卷以電腦統計套裝軟體IBM SPSS 18.0中文版進行統計與分析，調查結果分別以次數分配、百分比、平均數、標準差、獨立樣本t檢定、以及單因子變異數分析等統計方法進行資料分析：
一、 特殊教育學校館藏資源情形：大部分的特殊學校館藏資源數量、新增率及館藏經費皆未達高中圖書館應有的標準，且大多沒有強制要求，亦沒有遵循固定的標準與規範。
二、 特殊教育學校圖書館之營運情形：大部分的特殊學校沒有專職的管理人員，多由設備組長或者學校職員兼任，採用電腦線上借閱方式，且有建置館藏目錄系統、訂定使用及借閱辦法，讀者服務中大部分都有提供流通借閱服務。
三、 特殊教育學校圖書館的困難與需求：大多數為圖書館管理人員人力不足，沒有固定的編制，而且通常缺乏相關專業知識，另外受限於特殊學生的障礙程度，較難進行閱讀推動與利用教育。
四、 特殊教育學校教師使用學校圖書館的情形：多數的教師每週使用學校圖書館的次數為0次，但一個月內，平均每週使用1~5次的頻率最高，在使用上遇到困難時也會傾向詢問圖書館工作人員，大部分的老師選擇偶爾帶領學生認識圖書館，不算是太普遍的教學活動，使用目的上則多與教學準備有關，包含到圖書館借還圖書、配合教學蒐集教學相關資料及準備教材。
五、 特殊教育學校教師使用學校圖書館的滿意度情形：特殊教育學校教師對學校圖書館的滿意度均在平均值3以上，滿意度題目中，滿意程度最高的以圖書資料的採購會徵詢教師的意見與需求、教師對學校圖書館人員提供的服務、圖書館的空間擺設、動線與採光為前三名，而對館藏的品質、數量與館藏目錄系統較不滿意；在滿意度差異分析的部分，最不滿意的族群分別為在年齡46-50歲，學校所屬區域在東部及擔任導師的特教老師有顯著不滿意的情形。
=== The purpose of this study is to explore the situation of the construction of special education school library, the collection of resources, the use of special education teachers and satisfaction situation.
In the present study, the questionnaire is divided into two parts. The first part is the collection of the resources of the special education school library. The research object is the head of the 28 special schools in Taiwan. The questionnaire contains the basic information of the school , The organization of human resources, collection of resources and funding, operational management, read and promote the use of education and difficulties and needs, the total recovery of 24 valid questionnaires; the second part of the special education school teachers use the school library situation and satisfaction survey, The contents of the questionnaire include teachers' personal basic information, teachers use the school library situation and their satisfaction with the school library, the total recovery of 458 valid questionnaires. Two questionnaires The two questionnaires were analyzed by computer statistical software IBM SPSS 18.0. The results were analyzed by statistical methods such as frequency distribution, percentage, mean, standard deviation, independent sample t test, and one-way analysis of variance,ANOVA.
1. The special education school collection of resources: most of the special school collection of resources, the new rate and collection of funds are not high school library should have the standard, and most do not have mandatory requirements, nor follow the fixed standards and norms.
2. The special education school library operation situation: most of the special schools do not have full-time management staff, more by the equipment team leader or school staff, the use of computer online borrowing, and the establishment of the collection directory system, Approach, most of the readers have to provide services through the circulation of borrowing services.
3. The difficulties and needs of the special education school library: the majority of the library management staff lack of manpower, there is no fixed system, and usually lack of relevant professional knowledge, and subject to the degree of special student obstacles, more difficult to read and promote Use education.
4. The special education school teachers to use the school library situation: the majority of teachers weekly use of school library times 0 times, but within a month, the average weekly use of 1 to 5 times the highest frequency, encountered in the use Difficulties will also tend to ask the library staff, most of the teachers choose to occasionally lead students to understand the library, is not too common teaching activities, the use of the purpose of teaching and more related to the library to borrow books, with Teaching to collect teaching materials and preparation materials.
5. The special education school teachers to use the school library satisfaction situation: special education school teachers on the school library satisfaction are more than 3, the satisfaction of the title, the highest degree of satisfaction with the procurement of books will consult the teacher The views and needs of the teachers, the library staff to provide services, library space furnishings, moving lines and lighting for the top three, and the collection of quality, quantity and inventory directory system is not satisfied; in the satisfaction of differences in analysis , The most dissatisfied groups were in the case of 46-50 years of age, the school district in the east and served as a mentor of the special education teacher was significantly dissatisfied with the situation.
|
|---|
