國小學校建築用後評估指標建構之研究

• Main Authors: 李淑娟, Lee, Su Chuan
• Language: 中文
• Published: 國立政治大學
• Subjects: 用後評估; 學校建築; 模糊德菲術; Post-Occupancy Evaluation; School buildings; Fuzzy Delphi
• Online Access: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0102911021%22.

本研究旨在建立國小學校建築用後評估指標，透過國內外相關文獻整理，初擬出國小學校建築用後評估指標，經由國內專家進行適切性問卷與及模糊德菲術問卷評估，確立國小學校建築用後評估指標與權重，以提供未來主事之校長或教育主管機關自整體規劃階段能有所依循，將有限的預算發揮滿足教育所需最大效益。 本研究建構之指標系統共為三大構面、15個向度及104個指標項目，有關指標構面、向度權重排序為： 一、「建築設計」構面權重為36.64％，各向度權重介於3.54％至8.16％之間，依序為物理環境、設計原則、戶外空間、服務空間、教學空間、行政空間。 二、「使用與維護管理」構面權重為35.30％，各向度權重介於5.03％至8.25％之間，依序為安全性、維護成本、教學設備之使用、戶外空間之使用、室內空間之使用。 三、「整體規劃」構面權重為28.06％，各向度權重介於3.51％至9.73％之間，依序為動線規劃、空間配置、量體規劃、景觀綠美化。 在個別指標項目方面，在「整體規劃」構面下順位前3名依序為「1.1.5圖書館（室）位置符合使用需求」（1.2092％）、「1.3.3校內之人、車動線規劃，有明顯區隔」（1.0639％）、「1.3.1校門、地下停車場出入口位置已考量周邊道路鄰近社區設置」（1.0379％）。 「建築設計」構面下順位前3名依序為「2.1.2校舍屋頂形式具有良好防水及隔熱功能」（1.0968％）、「2.5.4排水系統規劃良好，不會造成校內地坪或走廊積水現象」（1.0666％）、「2.1.6校舍座向已考量日照及風向配置」（1.0653％）。 「使用與維護管理」構面下順位前3名依序為「3.4.8電動門（鐵捲門）啟動時有警示訊號」（1.0762％）、「3.5.3室內無漏水情形」（1.0749％）、「3.4.2女兒牆及欄杆的高度、型式均符合安全」（1.0721％）。 關鍵字：用後評估、學校建築、模糊德菲術 === This thesis approaches to establishing some evaltuion indexes of elemantry school buildings by studying local and global bibliography or articles. Using suitable “Questionnaire Survey” and “Fuzzy Delphi” theory on local savants and scholars by POE (Post-Occupancy Evalution), this thesis proves some evaltuion indexes and weight values those are useful and consultative for presidents of elemantry school or officials in Department of Education to manage campus more safety and spend budget more efficiency. After cases studying and database analyzing, this thesis figures out 15 factors and 104 index items in 3 principals, as follows: 1. 1st principal is “Architectural Design” (values:36.64%), and the evalution factors are physical environment > design rules > exterior > service area > teaching area > administ area.(values from 8.16% to 3.54%). 2.2nd principal is “Facility Management”(values:35.3%), and the evalution factors are safety > cost > use frequency of educational facility > use frequency of exterior > use frequency of interior(values from 8.25% to 5.03%). 3.3rd principal is “Master Plan”(values:28.06%), and the evalution factors are axials plan > spatial layout > mass plan > landscaoe plan(values from 9.73% to 3.51%). The analysis results in Index Item of “Master Plan” are as follows: (1) the location of library is suitable(values:1.2092%). (2) the path of pedestrians and vehicles is separated(values:1.0639%). (3) the exit of main door and parking lot is closed to communities(valuses:1.0379%) The analysis results in Index Item of “Aechitecture Design” are as follows: (1) the roof is water-proof and heat-protect(values:1.0968%). (2) the drainage system is useful to keep floor and balcony dry(values:1.0666%). (3) the layout of buildings is caused to sun-trace and wild-direction(values:1.0653%). The analysis results in Index Item of “Facility Management” is as follow: (1) operate the rolling door within alarm(values:1.0762%). (2) the interior is leak proof(values:1.0749%). (3) the height of parapet and railing is saft(values:1.0762%). Key wrod：Post-Occupancy Evaluation, School buildings、Fuzzy Delphi