我國大學生通識能力指標建構之研究

• Main Author: 紀盈如
• Language: 中文
• Published: 國立政治大學
• Subjects: 識教育; 大學生通識能力指標; 概念構圖
• Online Access: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0099171004%22.

本研究為建構我國大學生通識能力指標，透過文獻探討作為指標建構的理論基礎，初步分析歸納57項我國大學生通識能力指標，並以大學通識中心主任、教育學者專家及行政主管為問卷調查對象，採用模糊得菲術篩選及修改指標，建立31項我國大學生通識能力指標；再以概念構圖法與集群分析整合專家學者們對指標之重要性評估與分群，以建立構面，並求得各構面及指標權重，完成我國大學生通識能力指標建構。根據研究之結果與分析，歸納主要結論如下： 一、本研究建構之我國大學生通識能力指標，共計31項能力指標及五大構面。 二、五大構面及權重為「構面一：知識運用能力」（平均權重為3.39分）、「構面二：自我管理能力」(平均權重為4.12分）、「構面三：理性思辨與問題解決能力」（平均權重為3.96分）、「構面四：人際互動與溝通交流能力」（平均權重為4分）、「構面五：社會責任感與多元認知能力」（平均權重為3.75分）。 三、在「知識運用能力」構面中權重最重的指標為1-3學習整合能力(佔構面權重16.84%)；其次為1-6資訊倫理能力(佔構面權重15.44%)；再者為1-2跨領域能力及1-5資訊科技與媒體能力(佔構面權重15.09%)。 四、在「自我管理能力」構面中權重最重的指標為2-1健康管理能力及2-2情緒管理能力(佔構面權重21.05%)；其次為2-5自我學習能力(佔構面權重19.84%)。 五、在「理性思辨與問題解決能力」構面中權重最重的指標為3-6問題解決能力(佔構面權重17.54%)；其次為3-2批判思考與價值判斷能力(佔構面權重17.19%)；再者為3-1邏輯推理與思辯能力及3-5獨立思考能力(佔構面權重16.49%)。 六、在「人際互動與溝通交流能力」構面中權重最重的指標為4-2能與他人溝通能力(佔構面權重36.11%)。 七、在「社會責任感與多元認知能力」構面中權重最重的指標為5-1倫理道德與實踐能力(佔構面權重10.89%)；其次為5-2公民責任能力及5-8國際視野能力(佔構面權重10.67%)；再者為5-7多元文化認知、理解與尊重能力(佔構面權重10.44%)。 期望此項研究成果能提供我國高等教育主管機關、大學校院行政主管、教師及對未來研究之參考。 === This is a study aimed to establish the general education competency indicators for the college students in Taiwan. In the preliminary analysis, General Education Competency Indicators of 57 categories were initially proposed. Guided by the surveys of College Directors of General Education Centers, Education scholars, and Administrators, also adapting the Fuzzy Delphi Method as evaluation and revision model, competency indicators of 31 categories thus established. Concept mapping and cluster analysis were then applied to divide the 31 indicators into 5 separate dimensions as well as to obtain the weighting score of each indicator in its belonging dimension. The results of this study are identified accordingly as follows: 1.This study showed that the general education competency can be represented by 31 indicators and 5 dimensions. 2.The 5 dimensions of general education were self-management(4.12), Interpersonal interaction and communication(4), capacity of critical thinking and problem solving(3.96), social responsibility and multiple cognitive abilities(3.75), and knowledge application ability(3.39). 3.The dimension of knowledge application ability consisted of Integration of learning(16.84%), information ethics(15.44%), areas of knowledge and information technology and media(15.09%). 4.The dimension of self-management comprised of healthy-management(21.05%), emotional management(21.05%), and self-learning(19.84%). 5.The dimension of capacity of critical thinking and solving problem consisted of problem-solving(17.54%), capacity of critical thinking and value judgment (17.19%), logical rational thinking and independent thinking(16.49%). 6.The dimension of interpersonal interaction and communication was composed of capacity of communicating with mates (36.11%). 7.The dimension of social responsibility and multiple cognitive abilities was composed of ethical practice (10.89%), civic Responsibility (10.67%), international perspective(10.67%), multicultural and cognition, and understanding and respect(10.44%). The results of this study is highly anticipated to be utilized as a reference by higher education institutions and administration authorities, scholastic researchers, and additional future studies.