| Summary: | 本研究旨在瞭解基隆市高級中等學校校長領導風格與校園危機管理之現況，並分析教師人口變項、教師危機管理變項、學校環境變項在校長領導風格以及校園危機管理的差異情形，最後探討校長領導風格與校園危機管理之關係。
本研究以問卷調查法為主，半結構訪談為輔。問卷調查法以「高級中等學校校長領導風格與校園危機管理調查問卷」(內含基本資料、校長領導風格量表與校園危機管理量表)為工具，以基隆市高級中等學校教師為研究對象，分層隨機抽取11所學校，共發出問卷330份，回收272份，有效問卷272份，有效回收率為82.4％。所得資料以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析與
Scheff'e事後比較、 Pearson's積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料分析。並依正式問卷調查的結果，歸納相關的問題，設計並確定訪談大綱，做為訪談的依據，實地訪談2位校長，以釐清及延續問卷調查之結果，並藉由整理訪談文字資料、編碼歸類整理，綜合問卷調查與訪談資料，進行研究結果的分析與討論。研究結論如下：
壹、基隆市高級中等學校校長領導風格與校園危機管理之現況，
均屬良好程度。
貳、教師不同性別、服務年資、最高學歷對校長領導風格各個層
面之感受，並無顯著不同；教師不同性別、服務年資、最高
學歷在校園危機管理各個層面的感知上，並無顯著不同。
参、主任在校長領導風格與校園危機管理之感知上較好。
肆、教師是否參與危機研習、處理危機經驗、成立危機小組在校
園危機管理之整體及各個層面的感知上，並無顯著不同。
伍、學校規模不同的教師在校長領導風格及校園危機管理之感
受，並無顯著不同。
陸、創校歷史在「21~50年」及「51年以上」之教師對校長領導風
格及校園危機管理之感受，較「10年以下」之教師感受深刻。
柒、校長領導風格與校園危機管理間，有顯著的正相關。
捌、校長領導風格對整體校園危機管理具有預測力。
最後依據研究結果與結論，提出具體建議，以作為教育行政機關、高級中等學校校長、相關行政人員以及未來研究的參考。
=== This study aims to investigate the current development of principals’ leadership style and crisis management in Keelung high schools and to analyze the differences in teachers personal variables、teachers’ crisis management and school environmental variables. concerning principals’ leadership style and crisis management. Finally, it explores the relationship between principals’ leadership style and crisis management.
This study employs the research method of questionnaire surveys and semi structured interviews. There were two survey tools used in the study, including Principals’ Leadership Style Questionnaire and Crisis Management Questionnaire. Three hundred and thirty subjects are randomly selected from eleven high schools in Keelung city. A total of 272 questionnaires was returned. Out of those, 82.4% was valid (272 out of 330). Valid sample data was analyzed and processed using the methods of description statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA. Scheff’e posteriority comparison, Pearson's product-moment correlation and stepwise multiple regressions. The frame of the interview questions was designed according to the findings from the questionnaire. Two principals, were interviewed to clarify and extend the findings of the survey. Then. the data retrieved from questionnaires and interviews were compiled, categorized, synthesized and analyzed. Following is the summary of the study:
1. The current development of principals’ leadership style and the crisis management in high schools are both above the average.
2. There is no significant difference in teachers’ experiences of principals’ leadership style in terms of gender, seniority and educational background; and, there is no significant difference in teachers recognition about crisis management in terms of teachers gender, seniority, educational background.
3. Teacher to act as director in schools give better recognition in principals’ leadership style; and, teacher to act as director in schools give better recognition in the crisis management.
4. There is no significant difference in teachers’ experiences about crisis management in terms of crisis study, crisis experience, and crisis management team background.
5. There is no significant difference in both principals’ leadership style and crisis management to teachers from schools of different scales.
6. There are significant differences in both principals’ leadership style and crisis management to teachers from schools of different history.
7. It shows significant positive correlation between principals’ leadership style and crisis management.
8. Principals’ leadership style demonstrates the predictability of crisis management in high schools in Keelung city.
This study is finalized at proposing practical suggestions based on the findings
and conclusions to educational administration authorities, high principals, the director of schools and faculty for further study and reference.
|
|---|
