| Summary: | 香港和澳門為非國家行為者，在英國和葡萄牙的統治下都享有部分的對外事務權限。兩地分別確定在1997年和1999年重新回到中國的統治下，然在過渡期間，中英、中葡都瞭解到國際聯繫對香港、澳門未來發展的重要性，在「聯合聲明」與「基本法」中明確規範在回歸中國統治下的對外事務權限。整體而言，香港、澳門特區的國際地位在過渡期間有所提昇，但日後應會在框架內穩定發展。
=== 中華民國台灣的國際空間本質上不同於香港、澳門的對外事務權限，但都有深深受北京影響這個共通處，特別是在馬英九政府主張和對岸談判解決國際空間的情況下，香港、澳門的對外事務權限對我國有其參考價值。本文試著去分析和北京協商解決我國國際空間的利弊得失和預測將來可能的發展，期望能為這領域帶來一點建樹。
=== Being non-state actors, Hong Kong and Macau enjoyed some degree of external autonomy under British rule and Portuguese rule respectively. The PRC Government resumed the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong in 1997 and over Macau in 1999. During the transition period, the PRC along with Great Britain and Portugal realized the international links were crucial to Hong Kong and Macau. And both “Joint Declarations” and “ Basic Laws” provided that the 2 SARS ‘will enjoy a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defense affairs which are the responsibilities of the Central People’s Government.’ Overall, the international status of the 2 SARS expanded amid this process and would be stabilized in the future. === ROC (Taiwan)’s international affairs are essentially different from Hong Kong’s and Macau’s external affairs. However, they have one thing in common, which is that they are all strongly affected by the PRC. Ma administration advocates expanding ROC (Taiwan)’s international status via compromising with the PRC on it’s international status. In this case, I think we can learn a lesson from the 2 SARS’s experience. In this thesis, I managed to analyze the positive and the negative impacts of the negotiation with Beijing and predict the likely development of ROC (Taiwan)’s international affairs. I hoped I can make some contribution to this field of research.
|
|---|
