| Summary: | 退撫基金成立之目的主要為解決經費來源以減輕政府財政負擔，而退撫基金運作迄今已逾十年，退撫基金管理運用機構因受組織屬性、功能及人力之限，經營績效無法大幅提昇，因基金規模不斷成長，參加基金人數及支領定期給與之退休人數亦快速增加，面對日增之業務量，似有必要針對基金管理機構組織屬性、功能及人力配置等重新審視檢討。
鑑於基金運作之良窳，對於退撫基金支付能力具有關鍵性的影響，且涉及全國軍公教人員及各級政府退撫經費之負擔，因此，基金管理機構是否有適當之組織結構，能否採行企業化經營以靈活妥善運用基金，以及如何因應現有制度與管理上之缺失，創造高收益率以穩固退撫財源，均為本研究之重點。時值政府為提升國家整體競爭力，積極推動更具彈性與企業精神之「行政法人」，本研究乃分別就德國、英國、日本公法人制度，以及世界主要國家退休基金管理現況進行文獻探討，再針對我國退撫基金管理及運用現況進行檢視分析，復對基金管理會現職員工以問卷調查其對機關改制為行政法人之態度，並輔以深度訪談及SWOT分析等方法，以探究我國退撫基金管理機構行政法人化之可行性。
茲據研究結果發現，基金管理機構因受組織屬性、功能及人力之限，退撫基金管理無法獨立運作，致影響經營績效之提昇，其業務性質確具專業性，應頗適合行政法人化，惟因尚有潛藏負債、最後支付責任、行政法人法草案尚未建置完成以及現實上之政治生態等諸多考量，故建議其如擬行政法人化，應先明確區分政府及行政法人之潛藏負債及最後支付責任，並宜配合退休制度一同考量。
=== The purpose of establishing Public Service Pension Fund （PSPF）mainly focuses on reducing the financial burden of the government. However, after more than ten years of operation, the performance of the pension fund still cannot significantly improve due to the limitation of attributes, functions and human resources of organization. This, together with the adjustment of contribution rates to reflect the normal costs, has received universal condemnation and worries about how to improve the operation of the fund in order to relieve the pressure of raising contribution rates. Due to the gradual increase of workloads caused by the continued growth of fund scale, fund participants and the number of retirees receiving regularly payments, it seems to be necessary to inspect and review the attributes, functions and human resources of the fund management agency.
As the quality of the fund operation has crucial effects to the payment ability of the PSPF, and the expenditure burden of all fund participants and different levels of local governments, whether the fund management agency has proper organization structure, whether it is suitable to adopt the craft industry, and how to cope with the drawbacks of present system and management are the main points of this research. While the government is actively boosting “administrative corporation”, which is more flexible and possesses business spirit, with the aim of promoting integral competitiveness of the government, this research first literarily discusses public corporation system of Germany, Britain and Japan, and the current management state of main countries in the world. This is followed by an analysis of current management and operation state of the PSPF, and questionnaires filled by the employees of the Management Board of PSPF to understand their opinions on changing to administrative corporation. The analysis is reinforced by a deep interview, SWOT analysis and so on to investigate the feasibility of administrative corporation system for the management agency of PSPF..
This research finds out that being unable to operate independently, due to the limitations of organization attributes, functions and human resources, the PSPF’s management performance has been negatively influenced. Judging from agency functions, “administrative corporation” can be a suitable system for the organization. However, with considerations like inclined liabilities, final disbursement duty, and the Administrative Corporation Act still pending for legislative approval, it is suggested that a clear distinction between the inclined liabilities and final disbursement duty of the government and the administrative corporation has to be made, together with a consideration of the retirement system, before the “administrative corporation” system is put into real practice.
|
|---|
