Some results on projective equivalence relations

<p>We construct a ∏<sup>1</sup><sub>1</sub> equivalence relation E on ω<sup>ω</sup> for which there is no largest E-thin, E-invariant ∏<sup>1</sup><sub>1</sub> subset of ω<sup>ω</sup>. Then we lift our result to the gener...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Li, Xuhua
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 1998
Online Access:https://thesis.library.caltech.edu/10016/1/Li_X_1998.pdf
Li, Xuhua (1998) Some results on projective equivalence relations. Dissertation (Ph.D.), California Institute of Technology. doi:10.7907/pn2n-7z61. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechTHESIS:01202017-113604553 <https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechTHESIS:01202017-113604553>
Description
Summary:<p>We construct a ∏<sup>1</sup><sub>1</sub> equivalence relation E on ω<sup>ω</sup> for which there is no largest E-thin, E-invariant ∏<sup>1</sup><sub>1</sub> subset of ω<sup>ω</sup>. Then we lift our result to the general case. Namely, we show that there is a ∏<sup>1</sup><sub>2n+1</sub> equivalence relation for which there is no largest E-thin, E-invariant ∏<sup>1</sup><sub>2n+1</sub> set under projective determinacy. This answers an open problem raised in Kechris [Ke2].</p> <p>Our second result in this thesis is a representation for thin ∏<sup>1</sup><sub>3</sub> equivalence relations on u<sub>ω</sub>. Precisely, we show that for each thin ∏<sup>1</sup><sub>3</sub> equivalence relation E on u<sub>ω</sub>, there is a Δ<sup>1</sup><sub>3</sub> in the codes map p: ω<sup>ω</sup> → u<sub>ω</sub> and a ∏<sup>1</sup><sub>3</sub> in the codes equivalence relation e on u<sub>ω</sub> such that for all real numbers x and y,</p> <p>xEy ↔ (p(x),p(y))∈ e </p> <p>This lifts Harrington's result about thin ∏<sup>1</sup><sub>1</sub> equivalence relations to thin ∏<sup>1</sup><sub>3</sub> equivalence relations.</p>