Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool
RATIONALE, AIMS & OBJECTIVE: Tools for the assessment of the quality of research studies tend to be specific to a particular research design (e.g. randomized controlled trials, or qualitative interviews). This makes it difficult to assess the quality of a body of research that addresses the same...
Main Authors: | Sirriyeh, R. (See also Harrison, R.), Lawton, R., Gardner, P., Armitage, Gerry R. |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10454/7013 |
Similar Items
-
Getting messier with TIDieR: embracing context and complexity in intervention reporting
by: Sarah Cotterill, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Reliability and validity of MINCIR scale for methodological quality in dental therapy research
by: Ricardo Andrés Cartes-Velásquez, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Repeatability and intra-rater reproducibility of a digitalized test of body image perception
by: Emanuelle Francine Detogni Schmit, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01) -
Hurdles in Basic Science Translation
by: Christina J. Perry, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
QUADAS e STARD: avaliação da qualidade de estudos de acurácia de testes diagnósticos
by: Maria Regina Fernandes de Oliveira, et al.