Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers

Yes === To determine if a gradual adaptation period is necessary for neophytes when fitted with modern hydrogel or silicone hydrogel reusable disposable contact lenses. Across four sites, 74 neophytes (18-28 years) were randomly assigned to a reusable lens cleaned nightly with Opti-Free® Puremoist®...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wolffsohn, J.S., Ghorbani Mojarrad, Neema, Vianya-Estopa, M., Nagra, M., Huntjens, B., Terry, L., Sweeney, L.E., Dutta, D., Joshi, M.R., Wright, D., Bruce, H., Hallam, E., Jolly, L., Chung, Y.B., Tsen, J.R.E., Bishop, A., Davison, R., Maldonado-Codina, C.
Other Authors: British and Irish University and College Contact Lens Educators (BUCCLE)
Language:en
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10454/18649
id ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-18649
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-186492021-12-03T05:01:15Z Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers Wolffsohn, J.S. Ghorbani Mojarrad, Neema Vianya-Estopa, M. Nagra, M. Huntjens, B. Terry, L. Sweeney, L.E. Dutta, D. Joshi, M.R. Wright, D. Bruce, H. Hallam, E. Jolly, L. Chung, Y.B. Tsen, J.R.E. Bishop, A. Davison, R. Maldonado-Codina, C. British and Irish University and College Contact Lens Educators (BUCCLE) Soft contact lens Reusable Adaptation Neophyte Fast Gradual Yes To determine if a gradual adaptation period is necessary for neophytes when fitted with modern hydrogel or silicone hydrogel reusable disposable contact lenses. Across four sites, 74 neophytes (18-28 years) were randomly assigned to a reusable lens cleaned nightly with Opti-Free® Puremoist® multi-purpose contact lens solution: Proclear® (hydrogel) or Biofinity® (silicone hydrogel) and an adaptation schedule: fast (10 h wear from the first day) or gradual (4 h on the first day, increasing their wear time by 2 h on each subsequent day until they had reached 10 h). Masked investigators graded ocular surface physiology and non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT) and a range of comfort, vision and lens handling subjective ratings (0-100 visual analogue scales) were recorded at the baseline visit and after 10 h of lens wear, 4-6 days and 12-14 days after lens fitting. Subjective scores were also repeated after 7 days. There was no difference (p > 0.05) in ocular surface physiology or NIBUT between fast and gradual adaptation groups at any time point in either lens type with the exception of increased corneal staining (p = 0.019) in the silicone hydrogel fast adaptation group after 4-6 days, but was similar by 12-14 days. Subjective scores were also similar across the visits and lens types with the exception of 'lens awareness' (p = 0.019) which was less in the gradual versus the fast adaptation silicone hydrogel lens group at 12-14 days. There seems to be no clinical benefit for recommending a gradual adaptation period in new wearers fitted with modern soft reusable disposable contact lenses. The findings of this work add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that such advice is unnecessary in regular soft contact lens wear, which has important ramifications for the initial clinical management of these patients. BUCCLE The full-text of this article will be released for public view at the end of the publisher embargo on 24 May 2022. 2021-11-10T14:17:49Z 2021-11-25T11:00:39Z 2021-11-10T14:17:49Z 2021-11-25T11:00:39Z 2021 2021-05-09 2021-05-24 2022-05-24 2021-11-10T14:17:51Z Article Accepted manuscript Wolffsohn JS, Ghorbani Mojarrad N, Vianya-Estopa M et al (2021) Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. xx(xx): 101469. Accepted for publication. http://hdl.handle.net/10454/18649 en https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2021.101469 © 2021 Elsevier. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Soft contact lens
Reusable
Adaptation
Neophyte
Fast
Gradual
spellingShingle Soft contact lens
Reusable
Adaptation
Neophyte
Fast
Gradual
Wolffsohn, J.S.
Ghorbani Mojarrad, Neema
Vianya-Estopa, M.
Nagra, M.
Huntjens, B.
Terry, L.
Sweeney, L.E.
Dutta, D.
Joshi, M.R.
Wright, D.
Bruce, H.
Hallam, E.
Jolly, L.
Chung, Y.B.
Tsen, J.R.E.
Bishop, A.
Davison, R.
Maldonado-Codina, C.
Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers
description Yes === To determine if a gradual adaptation period is necessary for neophytes when fitted with modern hydrogel or silicone hydrogel reusable disposable contact lenses. Across four sites, 74 neophytes (18-28 years) were randomly assigned to a reusable lens cleaned nightly with Opti-Free® Puremoist® multi-purpose contact lens solution: Proclear® (hydrogel) or Biofinity® (silicone hydrogel) and an adaptation schedule: fast (10 h wear from the first day) or gradual (4 h on the first day, increasing their wear time by 2 h on each subsequent day until they had reached 10 h). Masked investigators graded ocular surface physiology and non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT) and a range of comfort, vision and lens handling subjective ratings (0-100 visual analogue scales) were recorded at the baseline visit and after 10 h of lens wear, 4-6 days and 12-14 days after lens fitting. Subjective scores were also repeated after 7 days. There was no difference (p > 0.05) in ocular surface physiology or NIBUT between fast and gradual adaptation groups at any time point in either lens type with the exception of increased corneal staining (p = 0.019) in the silicone hydrogel fast adaptation group after 4-6 days, but was similar by 12-14 days. Subjective scores were also similar across the visits and lens types with the exception of 'lens awareness' (p = 0.019) which was less in the gradual versus the fast adaptation silicone hydrogel lens group at 12-14 days. There seems to be no clinical benefit for recommending a gradual adaptation period in new wearers fitted with modern soft reusable disposable contact lenses. The findings of this work add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that such advice is unnecessary in regular soft contact lens wear, which has important ramifications for the initial clinical management of these patients. === BUCCLE === The full-text of this article will be released for public view at the end of the publisher embargo on 24 May 2022.
author2 British and Irish University and College Contact Lens Educators (BUCCLE)
author_facet British and Irish University and College Contact Lens Educators (BUCCLE)
Wolffsohn, J.S.
Ghorbani Mojarrad, Neema
Vianya-Estopa, M.
Nagra, M.
Huntjens, B.
Terry, L.
Sweeney, L.E.
Dutta, D.
Joshi, M.R.
Wright, D.
Bruce, H.
Hallam, E.
Jolly, L.
Chung, Y.B.
Tsen, J.R.E.
Bishop, A.
Davison, R.
Maldonado-Codina, C.
author Wolffsohn, J.S.
Ghorbani Mojarrad, Neema
Vianya-Estopa, M.
Nagra, M.
Huntjens, B.
Terry, L.
Sweeney, L.E.
Dutta, D.
Joshi, M.R.
Wright, D.
Bruce, H.
Hallam, E.
Jolly, L.
Chung, Y.B.
Tsen, J.R.E.
Bishop, A.
Davison, R.
Maldonado-Codina, C.
author_sort Wolffsohn, J.S.
title Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers
title_short Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers
title_full Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers
title_fullStr Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers
title_full_unstemmed Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers
title_sort fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers
publishDate 2021
url http://hdl.handle.net/10454/18649
work_keys_str_mv AT wolffsohnjs fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT ghorbanimojarradneema fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT vianyaestopam fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT nagram fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT huntjensb fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT terryl fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT sweeneyle fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT duttad fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT joshimr fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT wrightd fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT bruceh fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT hallame fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT jollyl fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT chungyb fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT tsenjre fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT bishopa fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT davisonr fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
AT maldonadocodinac fastversusgradualadaptationofsoftmonthlycontactlensesinneophytewearers
_version_ 1723963482357891072