How much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality?
Yes === Cardiologists use x-ray image sequences of the moving heart acquired in real-time to diagnose and treat cardiac patients. The amount of radiation used is proportional to image quality; however, exposure to radiation is damaging to patients and personnel. The amount by which radiation dose...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Language: | en |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16978 |
id |
ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-16978 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-169782019-08-31T03:05:04Z How much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality? Gislason-Lee, Amber J. Kumcu, A. Kengyelics, S.M. Brettle, D.S. Treadgold, L.A. Sivananthan, M. Davies, A.G. Angiography Cardiac x-ray imaging Image processing Simulated image noise Subjective image assessment Radiation dose Yes Cardiologists use x-ray image sequences of the moving heart acquired in real-time to diagnose and treat cardiac patients. The amount of radiation used is proportional to image quality; however, exposure to radiation is damaging to patients and personnel. The amount by which radiation dose can be reduced without compromising patient care was determined. For five patient image sequences, increments of computer-generated quantum noise (white + colored) were added to the images, frame by frame using pixel-to-pixel addition, to simulate corresponding increments of dose reduction. The noise adding software was calibrated for settings used in cardiac procedures, and validated using standard objective and subjective image quality measurements. The degraded images were viewed next to corresponding original (not degraded) images in a two-alternativeforced- choice staircase psychophysics experiment. Seven cardiologists and five radiographers selected their preferred image based on visualization of the coronary arteries. The point of subjective equality, i.e., level of degradation where the observer could not perceive a difference between the original and degraded images, was calculated; for all patients the median was 33% 15% dose reduction. This demonstrates that a 33% 15% increase in image noise is feasible without being perceived, indicating potential for 33% 15% dose reduction without compromising patient care. Funded in part by Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands. Part of this work has been performed in the project PANORAMA, co-funded by grants from Belgium, Italy, France, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, and the ENIAC Joint Undertaking. 2019-04-17T11:40:58Z 2019-04-17T11:40:58Z 2015-10 2015-09-09 2015-10-27 Article Published version Gisalson-Lee AJ, Kumcu A, Kengyelics SM et al (2015) How much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality? Journal of Electronic Imaging. 24(5): 051006. http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16978 en https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JEI.24.5.051006 Copyright 2015 Society of Photo‑Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic reproduction and distribution, duplication of any material in this publication for a fee or for commercial purposes, and modification of the contents of the publication are prohibited. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Angiography Cardiac x-ray imaging Image processing Simulated image noise Subjective image assessment Radiation dose |
spellingShingle |
Angiography Cardiac x-ray imaging Image processing Simulated image noise Subjective image assessment Radiation dose Gislason-Lee, Amber J. Kumcu, A. Kengyelics, S.M. Brettle, D.S. Treadgold, L.A. Sivananthan, M. Davies, A.G. How much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality? |
description |
Yes === Cardiologists use x-ray image sequences of the moving heart acquired in real-time to diagnose and
treat cardiac patients. The amount of radiation used is proportional to image quality; however, exposure to radiation
is damaging to patients and personnel. The amount by which radiation dose can be reduced without compromising
patient care was determined. For five patient image sequences, increments of computer-generated
quantum noise (white + colored) were added to the images, frame by frame using pixel-to-pixel addition, to
simulate corresponding increments of dose reduction. The noise adding software was calibrated for settings
used in cardiac procedures, and validated using standard objective and subjective image quality measurements.
The degraded images were viewed next to corresponding original (not degraded) images in a two-alternativeforced-
choice staircase psychophysics experiment. Seven cardiologists and five radiographers selected their
preferred image based on visualization of the coronary arteries. The point of subjective equality, i.e., level
of degradation where the observer could not perceive a difference between the original and degraded images,
was calculated; for all patients the median was 33% 15% dose reduction. This demonstrates that a 33%
15% increase in image noise is feasible without being perceived, indicating potential for 33% 15% dose reduction
without compromising patient care. === Funded in part by Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands. Part of this work has been performed in the project PANORAMA, co-funded by grants from Belgium, Italy, France, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, and the ENIAC Joint Undertaking. |
author |
Gislason-Lee, Amber J. Kumcu, A. Kengyelics, S.M. Brettle, D.S. Treadgold, L.A. Sivananthan, M. Davies, A.G. |
author_facet |
Gislason-Lee, Amber J. Kumcu, A. Kengyelics, S.M. Brettle, D.S. Treadgold, L.A. Sivananthan, M. Davies, A.G. |
author_sort |
Gislason-Lee, Amber J. |
title |
How much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality? |
title_short |
How much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality? |
title_full |
How much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality? |
title_fullStr |
How much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality? |
title_sort |
how much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality? |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16978 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gislasonleeamberj howmuchimagenoisecanbeaddedincardiacxrayimagingwithoutlossinperceivedimagequality AT kumcua howmuchimagenoisecanbeaddedincardiacxrayimagingwithoutlossinperceivedimagequality AT kengyelicssm howmuchimagenoisecanbeaddedincardiacxrayimagingwithoutlossinperceivedimagequality AT brettleds howmuchimagenoisecanbeaddedincardiacxrayimagingwithoutlossinperceivedimagequality AT treadgoldla howmuchimagenoisecanbeaddedincardiacxrayimagingwithoutlossinperceivedimagequality AT sivananthanm howmuchimagenoisecanbeaddedincardiacxrayimagingwithoutlossinperceivedimagequality AT daviesag howmuchimagenoisecanbeaddedincardiacxrayimagingwithoutlossinperceivedimagequality |
_version_ |
1719241255777468416 |