Inter-Ethnic and Demic-Group Variations in Craniofacial Anthropometry: A Review

yes === Craniofacial anthropometry plays an important role in facial structure. This review paper evaluates existing research surrounding population norms of studied facial parameters. The purpose is two-fold: (1) to determine variations in facial measurements due to demi-group or ethnic variations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jilani, Shelina K., Ugail, Hassan, Logan, Andrew J.
Language:en
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16740
id ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-16740
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-167402019-08-31T03:04:59Z Inter-Ethnic and Demic-Group Variations in Craniofacial Anthropometry: A Review Jilani, Shelina K. Ugail, Hassan Logan, Andrew J. Face Craniofacial Anthropometry Population data Demic-group Ethnicity Facial measurements Ethnic groups yes Craniofacial anthropometry plays an important role in facial structure. This review paper evaluates existing research surrounding population norms of studied facial parameters. The purpose is two-fold: (1) to determine variations in facial measurements due to demi-group or ethnic variations based on traditional (direct) caliper based and image based (indirect) anthropometric methods. (2) to compare where possible, measured facial parameters between referenced studies. Inter and intra-population variations in addition to sexual dimorphism of facial parameters such as the nose and eyes, singularly or in combination with one another, have been concluded. Ocular measurements have exhibited ethnic variations between males and females of the Saudi, Turkish, Egyptian and Iranian group. Moreover, demic variations are reported when the native language has been used a key criterion. It has been concluded that with the current state of migration and inter-demic marriages, the study of homogenous populations will prove difficult. Subsequently, this will result in ambiguous physical traits that are not representative for any one demic or ethnic population. In this paper, results for the following adult male and female populations have been discussed: African American, Azerbaijani, Caribbean, Chinese, Croatian, Egyptian, Italian, Iranian, Turkish, Saudi Arabian, Syrian and South African. The qualitative research presented serves as a knowledge base for learners and strikes up thought provoking concepts about the direction anthropometrical research is heading. 2019-01-09T16:02:57Z 2019-01-09T16:02:57Z 2019 2018-10-14 2018-10-15 Article published version paper Jilani SK, Ugail H and Logan A (2019) Inter-Ethnic and Demic-Group Variations in Craniofacial Anthropometry: A Review. PPSM Biological Research. 4(1): 6-16. http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16740 en https://journals.psmpublishers.org/index.php/biolres/article/view/225 © 2018 PSM. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License.
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Face
Craniofacial
Anthropometry
Population data
Demic-group
Ethnicity
Facial measurements
Ethnic groups
spellingShingle Face
Craniofacial
Anthropometry
Population data
Demic-group
Ethnicity
Facial measurements
Ethnic groups
Jilani, Shelina K.
Ugail, Hassan
Logan, Andrew J.
Inter-Ethnic and Demic-Group Variations in Craniofacial Anthropometry: A Review
description yes === Craniofacial anthropometry plays an important role in facial structure. This review paper evaluates existing research surrounding population norms of studied facial parameters. The purpose is two-fold: (1) to determine variations in facial measurements due to demi-group or ethnic variations based on traditional (direct) caliper based and image based (indirect) anthropometric methods. (2) to compare where possible, measured facial parameters between referenced studies. Inter and intra-population variations in addition to sexual dimorphism of facial parameters such as the nose and eyes, singularly or in combination with one another, have been concluded. Ocular measurements have exhibited ethnic variations between males and females of the Saudi, Turkish, Egyptian and Iranian group. Moreover, demic variations are reported when the native language has been used a key criterion. It has been concluded that with the current state of migration and inter-demic marriages, the study of homogenous populations will prove difficult. Subsequently, this will result in ambiguous physical traits that are not representative for any one demic or ethnic population. In this paper, results for the following adult male and female populations have been discussed: African American, Azerbaijani, Caribbean, Chinese, Croatian, Egyptian, Italian, Iranian, Turkish, Saudi Arabian, Syrian and South African. The qualitative research presented serves as a knowledge base for learners and strikes up thought provoking concepts about the direction anthropometrical research is heading.
author Jilani, Shelina K.
Ugail, Hassan
Logan, Andrew J.
author_facet Jilani, Shelina K.
Ugail, Hassan
Logan, Andrew J.
author_sort Jilani, Shelina K.
title Inter-Ethnic and Demic-Group Variations in Craniofacial Anthropometry: A Review
title_short Inter-Ethnic and Demic-Group Variations in Craniofacial Anthropometry: A Review
title_full Inter-Ethnic and Demic-Group Variations in Craniofacial Anthropometry: A Review
title_fullStr Inter-Ethnic and Demic-Group Variations in Craniofacial Anthropometry: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Inter-Ethnic and Demic-Group Variations in Craniofacial Anthropometry: A Review
title_sort inter-ethnic and demic-group variations in craniofacial anthropometry: a review
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16740
work_keys_str_mv AT jilanishelinak interethnicanddemicgroupvariationsincraniofacialanthropometryareview
AT ugailhassan interethnicanddemicgroupvariationsincraniofacialanthropometryareview
AT loganandrewj interethnicanddemicgroupvariationsincraniofacialanthropometryareview
_version_ 1719241204472741888