An evaluation of modelling approaches and column removal time on progressive collapse of building

Yes === Over the last few decades, progressive collapse disasters have drawn the attention of codified bodies around the globe; as a consequence, there has been a renewed research interest. Structural engineering systems are prone to progressive collapse when subjected to abnormal loads beyond the u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen, D., Lam, Dennis, Forth, J., Ye, J., Tsavdaridis, K.D.
Language:en
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16642
id ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-16642
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-166422019-10-29T03:11:25Z An evaluation of modelling approaches and column removal time on progressive collapse of building Stephen, D. Lam, Dennis Forth, J. Ye, J. Tsavdaridis, K.D. Progressive collapse Abnormal loads Modelling techniques Impact Explosions Structural response Sudden column loss Yes Over the last few decades, progressive collapse disasters have drawn the attention of codified bodies around the globe; as a consequence, there has been a renewed research interest. Structural engineering systems are prone to progressive collapse when subjected to abnormal loads beyond the ultimate capacity of critical structural members. Sudden loss of critical structural member(s) triggers failure mechanisms which may result in a total or partial collapse of the structure proportionate or disproportionate to the triggering event. Currently, researchers adopt different modelling techniques to simulate the loss of critical load bearing members for progressive collapse assessment. GSA guidelines recommend a column removal time less than a tenth of the period of the structure in the vertical vibration mode. Consequently, this recommendation allows a wide range of column removal time which produces inconsistent results satisfying GSA recommendation. A choice of a load time history function assumed for gravity and the internal column force interaction affects the response of the structure. This paper compares different alternative numerical approaches to simulate the sudden column removal in frame buildings and to investigate the effect of rising time on the structural response. 2018-11-05T17:03:56Z 2018-11-05T17:03:56Z 2019-02 2018-07-15 2018-10-25 Article Accepted Manuscript Stephen D, Lam D, Forth J et al (2018) An evaluation of modelling approaches and column removal time on progressive collapse of building. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 153: 243-253. http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16642 en https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.07.019 © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Progressive collapse
Abnormal loads
Modelling techniques
Impact
Explosions
Structural response
Sudden column loss
spellingShingle Progressive collapse
Abnormal loads
Modelling techniques
Impact
Explosions
Structural response
Sudden column loss
Stephen, D.
Lam, Dennis
Forth, J.
Ye, J.
Tsavdaridis, K.D.
An evaluation of modelling approaches and column removal time on progressive collapse of building
description Yes === Over the last few decades, progressive collapse disasters have drawn the attention of codified bodies around the globe; as a consequence, there has been a renewed research interest. Structural engineering systems are prone to progressive collapse when subjected to abnormal loads beyond the ultimate capacity of critical structural members. Sudden loss of critical structural member(s) triggers failure mechanisms which may result in a total or partial collapse of the structure proportionate or disproportionate to the triggering event. Currently, researchers adopt different modelling techniques to simulate the loss of critical load bearing members for progressive collapse assessment. GSA guidelines recommend a column removal time less than a tenth of the period of the structure in the vertical vibration mode. Consequently, this recommendation allows a wide range of column removal time which produces inconsistent results satisfying GSA recommendation. A choice of a load time history function assumed for gravity and the internal column force interaction affects the response of the structure. This paper compares different alternative numerical approaches to simulate the sudden column removal in frame buildings and to investigate the effect of rising time on the structural response.
author Stephen, D.
Lam, Dennis
Forth, J.
Ye, J.
Tsavdaridis, K.D.
author_facet Stephen, D.
Lam, Dennis
Forth, J.
Ye, J.
Tsavdaridis, K.D.
author_sort Stephen, D.
title An evaluation of modelling approaches and column removal time on progressive collapse of building
title_short An evaluation of modelling approaches and column removal time on progressive collapse of building
title_full An evaluation of modelling approaches and column removal time on progressive collapse of building
title_fullStr An evaluation of modelling approaches and column removal time on progressive collapse of building
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of modelling approaches and column removal time on progressive collapse of building
title_sort evaluation of modelling approaches and column removal time on progressive collapse of building
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16642
work_keys_str_mv AT stephend anevaluationofmodellingapproachesandcolumnremovaltimeonprogressivecollapseofbuilding
AT lamdennis anevaluationofmodellingapproachesandcolumnremovaltimeonprogressivecollapseofbuilding
AT forthj anevaluationofmodellingapproachesandcolumnremovaltimeonprogressivecollapseofbuilding
AT yej anevaluationofmodellingapproachesandcolumnremovaltimeonprogressivecollapseofbuilding
AT tsavdaridiskd anevaluationofmodellingapproachesandcolumnremovaltimeonprogressivecollapseofbuilding
AT stephend evaluationofmodellingapproachesandcolumnremovaltimeonprogressivecollapseofbuilding
AT lamdennis evaluationofmodellingapproachesandcolumnremovaltimeonprogressivecollapseofbuilding
AT forthj evaluationofmodellingapproachesandcolumnremovaltimeonprogressivecollapseofbuilding
AT yej evaluationofmodellingapproachesandcolumnremovaltimeonprogressivecollapseofbuilding
AT tsavdaridiskd evaluationofmodellingapproachesandcolumnremovaltimeonprogressivecollapseofbuilding
_version_ 1719280209677516800