Do seasoned offerings improve the performance of issuing firms? Evidence from China

Yes === This study provides new evidence that the performance of issuing firms varies by issue type, based on survival analysis methods. Our non-parametric results show that firms raising capital through rights issues, and notably through cash offers, experience a greater risk of delisting following...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang, D., Wu, Yuliang, Ye, Q., Liu, J.
Language:en
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16573
id ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-16573
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-165732019-08-31T03:04:55Z Do seasoned offerings improve the performance of issuing firms? Evidence from China Zhang, D. Wu, Yuliang Ye, Q. Liu, J. Seasoned issues Agency costs Corporate ownership and governance Firm viability Survival analysis Yes This study provides new evidence that the performance of issuing firms varies by issue type, based on survival analysis methods. Our non-parametric results show that firms raising capital through rights issues, and notably through cash offers, experience a greater risk of delisting following issuance, as compared to those issuing convertible bonds. Our Cox model analyses demonstrate that plain equity issues, in contrast to convertible issues, are subject to different degrees of regulatory discipline, obligations and incentives in shaping survival trajectory. Further, high ownership concentration, agency issues intrinsic to equity offerings, weak shareholders' protection, and corporate ownership and governance and corporate control development at the time of an offer markedly influence post-issue survival. Plain equity issues, notably cash offers, are strongly linked with the agency costs of free cash flows. A large and truly independent board, allied to a separation of CEO and chairman powers, acts as a primary restraint on managers' self-interested behaviour. Such a cohesive governance mechanism can restrain rent-seeking in the firm's fundraising initiative. These observations hold when we take into account information available before an issue, at the time of an issue, and after an issue, demonstrating the robustness of our findings. The full-text of this article will be released for public view at the end of the publisher embargo on 24 Feb 2020. 2018-09-17T16:06:42Z 2018-09-17T16:06:42Z 2019-03 2010-08-08 2018-08-23 2020-02-24 Article Accepted Manuscript Zhang D, Wu Y, Ye Q et al (2018) Do seasoned offerings improve the performance of issuing firms? Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis. 62: 104-123. http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16573 en https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.08.001 © 2018 Elsevier. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Seasoned issues
Agency costs
Corporate ownership and governance
Firm viability
Survival analysis
spellingShingle Seasoned issues
Agency costs
Corporate ownership and governance
Firm viability
Survival analysis
Zhang, D.
Wu, Yuliang
Ye, Q.
Liu, J.
Do seasoned offerings improve the performance of issuing firms? Evidence from China
description Yes === This study provides new evidence that the performance of issuing firms varies by issue type, based on survival analysis methods. Our non-parametric results show that firms raising capital through rights issues, and notably through cash offers, experience a greater risk of delisting following issuance, as compared to those issuing convertible bonds. Our Cox model analyses demonstrate that plain equity issues, in contrast to convertible issues, are subject to different degrees of regulatory discipline, obligations and incentives in shaping survival trajectory. Further, high ownership concentration, agency issues intrinsic to equity offerings, weak shareholders' protection, and corporate ownership and governance and corporate control development at the time of an offer markedly influence post-issue survival. Plain equity issues, notably cash offers, are strongly linked with the agency costs of free cash flows. A large and truly independent board, allied to a separation of CEO and chairman powers, acts as a primary restraint on managers' self-interested behaviour. Such a cohesive governance mechanism can restrain rent-seeking in the firm's fundraising initiative. These observations hold when we take into account information available before an issue, at the time of an issue, and after an issue, demonstrating the robustness of our findings. === The full-text of this article will be released for public view at the end of the publisher embargo on 24 Feb 2020.
author Zhang, D.
Wu, Yuliang
Ye, Q.
Liu, J.
author_facet Zhang, D.
Wu, Yuliang
Ye, Q.
Liu, J.
author_sort Zhang, D.
title Do seasoned offerings improve the performance of issuing firms? Evidence from China
title_short Do seasoned offerings improve the performance of issuing firms? Evidence from China
title_full Do seasoned offerings improve the performance of issuing firms? Evidence from China
title_fullStr Do seasoned offerings improve the performance of issuing firms? Evidence from China
title_full_unstemmed Do seasoned offerings improve the performance of issuing firms? Evidence from China
title_sort do seasoned offerings improve the performance of issuing firms? evidence from china
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16573
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangd doseasonedofferingsimprovetheperformanceofissuingfirmsevidencefromchina
AT wuyuliang doseasonedofferingsimprovetheperformanceofissuingfirmsevidencefromchina
AT yeq doseasonedofferingsimprovetheperformanceofissuingfirmsevidencefromchina
AT liuj doseasonedofferingsimprovetheperformanceofissuingfirmsevidencefromchina
_version_ 1719241171844202496