Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review

Yes === Aim: Pelvic radiography is used for the identification of hip joint changes, including pathologies such as osteoarthritis. Several studies have recommended that the position for this radiological procedure should be standing, not supine, to reflect the functional appearances of the hip joi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alzyoud, K., Hogg, P., Snaith, Beverly, Flintham, K., England, A.
Language:en
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16245
id ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-16245
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-162452019-08-31T03:04:52Z Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review Alzyoud, K. Hogg, P. Snaith, Beverly Flintham, K. England, A. Pelvis radiography Standing position Supine position Hip pathology Technique Pelvis tilt Yes Aim: Pelvic radiography is used for the identification of hip joint changes, including pathologies such as osteoarthritis. Several studies have recommended that the position for this radiological procedure should be standing, not supine, to reflect the functional appearances of the hip joint. The aim of this review was to evaluate pelvis radiography positioning with respect to the image appearances and information provided for clinical decision-making. Aside from this, potential recommendations to the radiographic technique for an erect pelvis projection will be considered. Method: A literature search was performed using databases/abstract systems (ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, and MEDLINE). Only articles written in English were included. Results: Twenty-five articles were identified. Findings from the review describe the effect of repositioning from supine to erect on a series of specific hip measurements. These include pelvic tilt, joint space width, and the acetabular component. Conclusion: Evidence within the literature illustrates that in several studies, there were differences when repositioning from supine to standing for a number of pelvic metrics. Standing positioning is promoted by some authors since this may facilitate the early diagnosis of hip joint pathology and assist in the planning of surgical interventions. Literature is very limited on how to optimally perform erect pelvis radiography, and this should be an area for future research. 2018-06-20T14:21:54Z 2018-06-20T14:21:54Z 2018-09 2018-04-09 2018-05-15 Article Accepted Manuscript Alzyoud K, Hogg P, Snaith B et al (2018) Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 49(3): 316-324.e3 http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16245 en https://www.jmirs.org/article/S1939-8654(18)30020-1/fulltext © 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Pelvis radiography
Standing position
Supine position
Hip pathology
Technique
Pelvis tilt
spellingShingle Pelvis radiography
Standing position
Supine position
Hip pathology
Technique
Pelvis tilt
Alzyoud, K.
Hogg, P.
Snaith, Beverly
Flintham, K.
England, A.
Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review
description Yes === Aim: Pelvic radiography is used for the identification of hip joint changes, including pathologies such as osteoarthritis. Several studies have recommended that the position for this radiological procedure should be standing, not supine, to reflect the functional appearances of the hip joint. The aim of this review was to evaluate pelvis radiography positioning with respect to the image appearances and information provided for clinical decision-making. Aside from this, potential recommendations to the radiographic technique for an erect pelvis projection will be considered. Method: A literature search was performed using databases/abstract systems (ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, and MEDLINE). Only articles written in English were included. Results: Twenty-five articles were identified. Findings from the review describe the effect of repositioning from supine to erect on a series of specific hip measurements. These include pelvic tilt, joint space width, and the acetabular component. Conclusion: Evidence within the literature illustrates that in several studies, there were differences when repositioning from supine to standing for a number of pelvic metrics. Standing positioning is promoted by some authors since this may facilitate the early diagnosis of hip joint pathology and assist in the planning of surgical interventions. Literature is very limited on how to optimally perform erect pelvis radiography, and this should be an area for future research.
author Alzyoud, K.
Hogg, P.
Snaith, Beverly
Flintham, K.
England, A.
author_facet Alzyoud, K.
Hogg, P.
Snaith, Beverly
Flintham, K.
England, A.
author_sort Alzyoud, K.
title Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review
title_short Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review
title_full Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review
title_fullStr Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review
title_full_unstemmed Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review
title_sort optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: a literature review
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16245
work_keys_str_mv AT alzyoudk optimumpositioningforanteroposteriorpelvisradiographyaliteraturereview
AT hoggp optimumpositioningforanteroposteriorpelvisradiographyaliteraturereview
AT snaithbeverly optimumpositioningforanteroposteriorpelvisradiographyaliteraturereview
AT flinthamk optimumpositioningforanteroposteriorpelvisradiographyaliteraturereview
AT englanda optimumpositioningforanteroposteriorpelvisradiographyaliteraturereview
_version_ 1719241140484440064