Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review
Yes === Aim: Pelvic radiography is used for the identification of hip joint changes, including pathologies such as osteoarthritis. Several studies have recommended that the position for this radiological procedure should be standing, not supine, to reflect the functional appearances of the hip joi...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Language: | en |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16245 |
id |
ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-16245 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-162452019-08-31T03:04:52Z Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review Alzyoud, K. Hogg, P. Snaith, Beverly Flintham, K. England, A. Pelvis radiography Standing position Supine position Hip pathology Technique Pelvis tilt Yes Aim: Pelvic radiography is used for the identification of hip joint changes, including pathologies such as osteoarthritis. Several studies have recommended that the position for this radiological procedure should be standing, not supine, to reflect the functional appearances of the hip joint. The aim of this review was to evaluate pelvis radiography positioning with respect to the image appearances and information provided for clinical decision-making. Aside from this, potential recommendations to the radiographic technique for an erect pelvis projection will be considered. Method: A literature search was performed using databases/abstract systems (ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, and MEDLINE). Only articles written in English were included. Results: Twenty-five articles were identified. Findings from the review describe the effect of repositioning from supine to erect on a series of specific hip measurements. These include pelvic tilt, joint space width, and the acetabular component. Conclusion: Evidence within the literature illustrates that in several studies, there were differences when repositioning from supine to standing for a number of pelvic metrics. Standing positioning is promoted by some authors since this may facilitate the early diagnosis of hip joint pathology and assist in the planning of surgical interventions. Literature is very limited on how to optimally perform erect pelvis radiography, and this should be an area for future research. 2018-06-20T14:21:54Z 2018-06-20T14:21:54Z 2018-09 2018-04-09 2018-05-15 Article Accepted Manuscript Alzyoud K, Hogg P, Snaith B et al (2018) Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 49(3): 316-324.e3 http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16245 en https://www.jmirs.org/article/S1939-8654(18)30020-1/fulltext © 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Pelvis radiography Standing position Supine position Hip pathology Technique Pelvis tilt |
spellingShingle |
Pelvis radiography Standing position Supine position Hip pathology Technique Pelvis tilt Alzyoud, K. Hogg, P. Snaith, Beverly Flintham, K. England, A. Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review |
description |
Yes === Aim:
Pelvic radiography is used for the identification of hip joint changes, including pathologies such as osteoarthritis. Several studies have recommended that the position for this radiological procedure should be standing, not supine, to reflect the functional appearances of the hip joint. The aim of this review was to evaluate pelvis radiography positioning with respect to the image appearances and information provided for clinical decision-making. Aside from this, potential recommendations to the radiographic technique for an erect pelvis projection will be considered.
Method:
A literature search was performed using databases/abstract systems (ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PubMed, and MEDLINE). Only articles written in English were included.
Results:
Twenty-five articles were identified. Findings from the review describe the effect of repositioning from supine to erect on a series of specific hip measurements. These include pelvic tilt, joint space width, and the acetabular component.
Conclusion:
Evidence within the literature illustrates that in several studies, there were differences when repositioning from supine to standing for a number of pelvic metrics. Standing positioning is promoted by some authors since this may facilitate the early diagnosis of hip joint pathology and assist in the planning of surgical interventions. Literature is very limited on how to optimally perform erect pelvis radiography, and this should be an area for future research. |
author |
Alzyoud, K. Hogg, P. Snaith, Beverly Flintham, K. England, A. |
author_facet |
Alzyoud, K. Hogg, P. Snaith, Beverly Flintham, K. England, A. |
author_sort |
Alzyoud, K. |
title |
Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review |
title_short |
Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review |
title_full |
Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review |
title_fullStr |
Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: A literature review |
title_sort |
optimum positioning for anteroposterior pelvis radiography: a literature review |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16245 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alzyoudk optimumpositioningforanteroposteriorpelvisradiographyaliteraturereview AT hoggp optimumpositioningforanteroposteriorpelvisradiographyaliteraturereview AT snaithbeverly optimumpositioningforanteroposteriorpelvisradiographyaliteraturereview AT flinthamk optimumpositioningforanteroposteriorpelvisradiographyaliteraturereview AT englanda optimumpositioningforanteroposteriorpelvisradiographyaliteraturereview |
_version_ |
1719241140484440064 |