Essays in Contest Theory:

Thesis advisor: Hideo Konishi === The majority of this work focuses on the theoretical analysis of collective action, group efficiency, and incentive mechanisms in team contests where individual outlays of heterogeneous agents are not observable. The reward allocation within the group is instead de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Simeonov, Dimitar
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Boston College 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108933
id ndltd-BOSTON-oai-dlib.bc.edu-bc-ir_108933
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BOSTON-oai-dlib.bc.edu-bc-ir_1089332020-08-11T05:00:46Z Essays in Contest Theory: Simeonov, Dimitar Thesis advisor: Hideo Konishi Text thesis 2020 Boston College English electronic application/pdf The majority of this work focuses on the theoretical analysis of collective action, group efficiency, and incentive mechanisms in team contests where individual outlays of heterogeneous agents are not observable. The reward allocation within the group is instead dependent on observable worker characteristics, modeled as individual abilities, as well as on the observable level of aggregate output. I study the incentives for free-riding and the group-size paradox under a very general set of intra-team allocation rules. I further derive the optimal allocation mechanism which rewards agents according to a general-logit specification based on their relative ability. I derive conditions under which a team's performance is most sensitive to the ability of its highest-skill members, while at the same time higher spread in the distribution of ability has a positive effect on group output. In the final chapter I shift attention to the problem of optimal player order choice in dynamic pairwise team battles. I show that even if player order choice is conducted endogenously and sequentially after observing the outcomes of earlier rounds, then complete randomization over remaining agents is always a subgame perfect equilibrium. The zero-sum nature of these type of contests implies that expected payoffs for each team are independent of whether the contest matching pairs are determined endogenously and sequentially or announced before the start of the game. In both cases the ex-ante payoffs are equivalent to those when an independent contest organizer randomly draws the matches. dynamic battle efficiency free riding Group contest group size incentives Copyright is held by the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2020. Submitted to: Boston College. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. Discipline: Economics. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108933
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic dynamic battle
efficiency
free riding
Group contest
group size
incentives
spellingShingle dynamic battle
efficiency
free riding
Group contest
group size
incentives
Simeonov, Dimitar
Essays in Contest Theory:
description Thesis advisor: Hideo Konishi === The majority of this work focuses on the theoretical analysis of collective action, group efficiency, and incentive mechanisms in team contests where individual outlays of heterogeneous agents are not observable. The reward allocation within the group is instead dependent on observable worker characteristics, modeled as individual abilities, as well as on the observable level of aggregate output. I study the incentives for free-riding and the group-size paradox under a very general set of intra-team allocation rules. I further derive the optimal allocation mechanism which rewards agents according to a general-logit specification based on their relative ability. I derive conditions under which a team's performance is most sensitive to the ability of its highest-skill members, while at the same time higher spread in the distribution of ability has a positive effect on group output. In the final chapter I shift attention to the problem of optimal player order choice in dynamic pairwise team battles. I show that even if player order choice is conducted endogenously and sequentially after observing the outcomes of earlier rounds, then complete randomization over remaining agents is always a subgame perfect equilibrium. The zero-sum nature of these type of contests implies that expected payoffs for each team are independent of whether the contest matching pairs are determined endogenously and sequentially or announced before the start of the game. In both cases the ex-ante payoffs are equivalent to those when an independent contest organizer randomly draws the matches. === Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2020. === Submitted to: Boston College. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. === Discipline: Economics.
author Simeonov, Dimitar
author_facet Simeonov, Dimitar
author_sort Simeonov, Dimitar
title Essays in Contest Theory:
title_short Essays in Contest Theory:
title_full Essays in Contest Theory:
title_fullStr Essays in Contest Theory:
title_full_unstemmed Essays in Contest Theory:
title_sort essays in contest theory:
publisher Boston College
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108933
work_keys_str_mv AT simeonovdimitar essaysincontesttheory
_version_ 1719336876757745664