Competence and Effort: The Role of Children's Metacognitive Judgments in Strategy Selection
Thesis advisor: Elida V. Laski === Strategy selection is an essential aspect of problem-solving, particularly within the domain of mathematics. This dissertation examines the mechanisms that guide children’s arithmetic strategy selection in order to advance theoretical understanding of this essentia...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Boston College
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108609 |
id |
ndltd-BOSTON-oai-dlib.bc.edu-bc-ir_108609 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-BOSTON-oai-dlib.bc.edu-bc-ir_1086092020-08-14T05:00:41Z Competence and Effort: The Role of Children's Metacognitive Judgments in Strategy Selection Schiffman, Joanna Thesis advisor: Elida V. Laski Text thesis 2019 Boston College English electronic application/pdf Strategy selection is an essential aspect of problem-solving, particularly within the domain of mathematics. This dissertation examines the mechanisms that guide children’s arithmetic strategy selection in order to advance theoretical understanding of this essential component of cognitive development. Better understanding of arithmetic strategy selection is important because individual differences in children’s arithmetic strategies are predictive of arithmetic accuracy and later math achievement. The current study builds upon prior research that has identified cognitive processes associated with strategy selection by considering the role of metacognitive judgments. The study investigated the direct and indirect effects of cognitive and metacognitive factors on strategy selection in a group of first and second grade students (n = 126). The majority of students generated metacognitive judgments of their competence using decomposition (an advanced strategy at this age) that were consistent with their actual ability. In these cases, their judgments of competence were related to the frequency with which they used decomposition strategies. Additionally, children’s metacognitive judgments of the anticipated amount effort required to execute decomposition mediated the association between children’s cognitive processes/pre-requisite knowledge (working memory and fact fluency) and the frequency with which they used it. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. arithmetic arithmetic strategies early childhood mathematics metacognition Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2019. Submitted to: Boston College. Lynch School of Education. Discipline: Counseling, Developmental and Educational Psychology. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108609 |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
arithmetic arithmetic strategies early childhood mathematics metacognition |
spellingShingle |
arithmetic arithmetic strategies early childhood mathematics metacognition Schiffman, Joanna Competence and Effort: The Role of Children's Metacognitive Judgments in Strategy Selection |
description |
Thesis advisor: Elida V. Laski === Strategy selection is an essential aspect of problem-solving, particularly within the domain of mathematics. This dissertation examines the mechanisms that guide children’s arithmetic strategy selection in order to advance theoretical understanding of this essential component of cognitive development. Better understanding of arithmetic strategy selection is important because individual differences in children’s arithmetic strategies are predictive of arithmetic accuracy and later math achievement. The current study builds upon prior research that has identified cognitive processes associated with strategy selection by considering the role of metacognitive judgments. The study investigated the direct and indirect effects of cognitive and metacognitive factors on strategy selection in a group of first and second grade students (n = 126). The majority of students generated metacognitive judgments of their competence using decomposition (an advanced strategy at this age) that were consistent with their actual ability. In these cases, their judgments of competence were related to the frequency with which they used decomposition strategies. Additionally, children’s metacognitive judgments of the anticipated amount effort required to execute decomposition mediated the association between children’s cognitive processes/pre-requisite knowledge (working memory and fact fluency) and the frequency with which they used it. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. === Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2019. === Submitted to: Boston College. Lynch School of Education. === Discipline: Counseling, Developmental and Educational Psychology. |
author |
Schiffman, Joanna |
author_facet |
Schiffman, Joanna |
author_sort |
Schiffman, Joanna |
title |
Competence and Effort: The Role of Children's Metacognitive Judgments in Strategy Selection |
title_short |
Competence and Effort: The Role of Children's Metacognitive Judgments in Strategy Selection |
title_full |
Competence and Effort: The Role of Children's Metacognitive Judgments in Strategy Selection |
title_fullStr |
Competence and Effort: The Role of Children's Metacognitive Judgments in Strategy Selection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Competence and Effort: The Role of Children's Metacognitive Judgments in Strategy Selection |
title_sort |
competence and effort: the role of children's metacognitive judgments in strategy selection |
publisher |
Boston College |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108609 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT schiffmanjoanna competenceandefforttheroleofchildrensmetacognitivejudgmentsinstrategyselection |
_version_ |
1719337810653085696 |