Three essays in corporate finance and corporate governance

Thesis advisor: Philip Strahan === In my first essay, I find that CEOs with more control over the firm have smaller compensation packages and are less likely to have severance contracts. Despite lower pay, these CEOs have longer tenure and their boards' replacement decisions are less sensitive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohseni, Mahdi
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Boston College 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104372
id ndltd-BOSTON-oai-dlib.bc.edu-bc-ir_104372
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BOSTON-oai-dlib.bc.edu-bc-ir_1043722019-05-10T07:35:13Z Three essays in corporate finance and corporate governance Mohseni, Mahdi Thesis advisor: Philip Strahan Text thesis 2015 Boston College English electronic application/pdf In my first essay, I find that CEOs with more control over the firm have smaller compensation packages and are less likely to have severance contracts. Despite lower pay, these CEOs have longer tenure and their boards' replacement decisions are less sensitive to their performance, which is consistent with the view that there is a trade-off between pay and dismissal risk. To mitigate endogeneity concerns, I use divorce as an exogenous shock to CEO equity ownership, and find that following a divorce, turnover risk goes up and pay increases significantly. My findings highlight the importance of turnover risk in studying executive compensation. The second essay shows that staggered boards are associated with higher private benefits of control. We find that companies de-staggering their boards experience a decrease in control premiums. Using two court rulings in 2010 with opposite decisions on the effectiveness of staggered boards, we show that our findings are not driven by the endogeneity of the corporate control. Finally, we find evidence that the stock market reactions to the court rulings are negatively associated with the changes in control premium. Overall, our results suggest that staggered boards decrease shareholder value via entrenchment. In my third essay, I study the impact of accounting practices on debt renegotiations and covenant violations. Firms that recognize losses in a timelier manner (i.e., have more conservative accounting practices) have less slack at any given time and are more likely to violate loan covenants. But the consequences of a covenant violation by such firms differ from those of firms with aggressive accounting practices. I also find that firms with more conservative accounting practices are more likely to renegotiate their loans with creditors. Corporate governance Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2015. Submitted to: Boston College. Carroll School of Management. Discipline: Finance. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104372 Corporate finance
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Corporate governance
Corporate finance
spellingShingle Corporate governance
Corporate finance
Mohseni, Mahdi
Three essays in corporate finance and corporate governance
description Thesis advisor: Philip Strahan === In my first essay, I find that CEOs with more control over the firm have smaller compensation packages and are less likely to have severance contracts. Despite lower pay, these CEOs have longer tenure and their boards' replacement decisions are less sensitive to their performance, which is consistent with the view that there is a trade-off between pay and dismissal risk. To mitigate endogeneity concerns, I use divorce as an exogenous shock to CEO equity ownership, and find that following a divorce, turnover risk goes up and pay increases significantly. My findings highlight the importance of turnover risk in studying executive compensation. The second essay shows that staggered boards are associated with higher private benefits of control. We find that companies de-staggering their boards experience a decrease in control premiums. Using two court rulings in 2010 with opposite decisions on the effectiveness of staggered boards, we show that our findings are not driven by the endogeneity of the corporate control. Finally, we find evidence that the stock market reactions to the court rulings are negatively associated with the changes in control premium. Overall, our results suggest that staggered boards decrease shareholder value via entrenchment. In my third essay, I study the impact of accounting practices on debt renegotiations and covenant violations. Firms that recognize losses in a timelier manner (i.e., have more conservative accounting practices) have less slack at any given time and are more likely to violate loan covenants. But the consequences of a covenant violation by such firms differ from those of firms with aggressive accounting practices. I also find that firms with more conservative accounting practices are more likely to renegotiate their loans with creditors. === Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2015. === Submitted to: Boston College. Carroll School of Management. === Discipline: Finance.
author Mohseni, Mahdi
author_facet Mohseni, Mahdi
author_sort Mohseni, Mahdi
title Three essays in corporate finance and corporate governance
title_short Three essays in corporate finance and corporate governance
title_full Three essays in corporate finance and corporate governance
title_fullStr Three essays in corporate finance and corporate governance
title_full_unstemmed Three essays in corporate finance and corporate governance
title_sort three essays in corporate finance and corporate governance
publisher Boston College
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104372
work_keys_str_mv AT mohsenimahdi threeessaysincorporatefinanceandcorporategovernance
_version_ 1719079201777123328