Physical Activity Motivational Factors of Activity Trackers for Young Adults

BACKGROUND: Physical activity for the majority of individuals is below recommended levels despite strong evidence of its significant health benefits. Activity tracker devices present as a promising and affordable tool to help promote physical activity and active choices. Additionally, young adults p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dalton, Amy L.
Format: Others
Published: BYU ScholarsArchive 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8618
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9618&context=etd
id ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-9618
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-96182021-09-17T05:01:10Z Physical Activity Motivational Factors of Activity Trackers for Young Adults Dalton, Amy L. BACKGROUND: Physical activity for the majority of individuals is below recommended levels despite strong evidence of its significant health benefits. Activity tracker devices present as a promising and affordable tool to help promote physical activity and active choices. Additionally, young adults present as an ideal age group to implement behavior change interventions. OBJECTIVE: To determine what features of activity tracker hardware and software are helpful in motivating active choices. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 149 participants ranging in age from 18-29 years old who wore an ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer for one week. They then continued to wear the accelerometer in addition to a randomly assigned activity tracker (Apple Watch, Fitbit Surge, Basis Peak, or Microsoft Band 2) for an additional week. They also used the corresponding app for their activity tracker. Participants filled out a survey about their experience at the end of the study RESULTS: Overall hardware rating (p = 0.162) and overall software rating (p = 0.125) did not differ between the four devices. Degree of motivation of the hardware (p = 0.177) and software (p = 0.120) was also similar for all the activity trackers. There were 625 positive comments made about tracker hardware with the majority of these comments concerning mode options (n = 149), other (n = 94), and battery (n = 79). There were 287 positive software comments with the majority in the categories of other (n = 78) and information (n = 68). CONCLUSIONS: The analyses of our data did not show a significant difference between devices in any category. Furthermore, results indicated a high number of positive comments for both hardware and software overall. Users also reported device hardware and software to be personally motivating. 2020-06-25T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8618 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9618&context=etd https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/ Theses and Dissertations BYU ScholarsArchive physical activity activity tracker motivation young adults motivational features electronic activity tracker physical activity Nursing
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic physical activity
activity tracker
motivation
young adults
motivational features
electronic activity tracker
physical activity
Nursing
spellingShingle physical activity
activity tracker
motivation
young adults
motivational features
electronic activity tracker
physical activity
Nursing
Dalton, Amy L.
Physical Activity Motivational Factors of Activity Trackers for Young Adults
description BACKGROUND: Physical activity for the majority of individuals is below recommended levels despite strong evidence of its significant health benefits. Activity tracker devices present as a promising and affordable tool to help promote physical activity and active choices. Additionally, young adults present as an ideal age group to implement behavior change interventions. OBJECTIVE: To determine what features of activity tracker hardware and software are helpful in motivating active choices. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 149 participants ranging in age from 18-29 years old who wore an ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer for one week. They then continued to wear the accelerometer in addition to a randomly assigned activity tracker (Apple Watch, Fitbit Surge, Basis Peak, or Microsoft Band 2) for an additional week. They also used the corresponding app for their activity tracker. Participants filled out a survey about their experience at the end of the study RESULTS: Overall hardware rating (p = 0.162) and overall software rating (p = 0.125) did not differ between the four devices. Degree of motivation of the hardware (p = 0.177) and software (p = 0.120) was also similar for all the activity trackers. There were 625 positive comments made about tracker hardware with the majority of these comments concerning mode options (n = 149), other (n = 94), and battery (n = 79). There were 287 positive software comments with the majority in the categories of other (n = 78) and information (n = 68). CONCLUSIONS: The analyses of our data did not show a significant difference between devices in any category. Furthermore, results indicated a high number of positive comments for both hardware and software overall. Users also reported device hardware and software to be personally motivating.
author Dalton, Amy L.
author_facet Dalton, Amy L.
author_sort Dalton, Amy L.
title Physical Activity Motivational Factors of Activity Trackers for Young Adults
title_short Physical Activity Motivational Factors of Activity Trackers for Young Adults
title_full Physical Activity Motivational Factors of Activity Trackers for Young Adults
title_fullStr Physical Activity Motivational Factors of Activity Trackers for Young Adults
title_full_unstemmed Physical Activity Motivational Factors of Activity Trackers for Young Adults
title_sort physical activity motivational factors of activity trackers for young adults
publisher BYU ScholarsArchive
publishDate 2020
url https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8618
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9618&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT daltonamyl physicalactivitymotivationalfactorsofactivitytrackersforyoungadults
_version_ 1719481174293741568