Analysis of Performance Measures of Traffic Incident Management in Utah

In 2009 the Federal Highway Administration published a report regarding a Focus States Initiative that had been conducted with 11 states to discuss the development of national Traffic Incident Management (TIM) standards. Performance measures were defined, and a national TIM dashboard created, but ve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hadfield, Mitchell Gregory
Format: Others
Published: BYU ScholarsArchive 2020
Subjects:
TIM
Online Access:https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8529
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9529&context=etd
id ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-9529
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-95292021-09-17T05:01:01Z Analysis of Performance Measures of Traffic Incident Management in Utah Hadfield, Mitchell Gregory In 2009 the Federal Highway Administration published a report regarding a Focus States Initiative that had been conducted with 11 states to discuss the development of national Traffic Incident Management (TIM) standards. Performance measures were defined, and a national TIM dashboard created, but very little data has been added to the dashboard since. In this research study, performance measures of the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) TIM program were analyzed. Data availability was first assessed to determine whether these performance measures could be calculated. It was determined that crash response data available from the Utah Highway Patrol (UHP) could be used to calculate the performance measures of Incident Management Teams (IMT) and UHP units; however, roadway clearance data were missing. UHP personnel agreed to collect additional data regarding crash roadway clearance for six months of the study. Performance measures of response time (RT), roadway clearance time (RCT), and incident clearance time (ICT) were calculated for responding units at 168 crashes. Using the crash response data from UHP and traffic speed, travel time, and volume data from UDOT databases, 83 of the 163 crashes that met additional criteria were evaluated to determine the volume of traffic affected (AV) by each incident and the associated user cost (EUC). Statistical analyses to determine relationships between different measures such as RT, RCT, ICT, AV, and EUC were conducted to assist UDOT in optimizing the allocation of their IMT resources. 2020-06-16T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8529 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9529&context=etd https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/ Theses and Dissertations BYU ScholarsArchive traffic incident management incident management team performance measures response time roadway clearance time incident clearance time excess travel time excess user cost TIM Engineering
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic traffic incident management
incident management team
performance measures
response time
roadway clearance time
incident clearance time
excess travel time
excess user cost
TIM
Engineering
spellingShingle traffic incident management
incident management team
performance measures
response time
roadway clearance time
incident clearance time
excess travel time
excess user cost
TIM
Engineering
Hadfield, Mitchell Gregory
Analysis of Performance Measures of Traffic Incident Management in Utah
description In 2009 the Federal Highway Administration published a report regarding a Focus States Initiative that had been conducted with 11 states to discuss the development of national Traffic Incident Management (TIM) standards. Performance measures were defined, and a national TIM dashboard created, but very little data has been added to the dashboard since. In this research study, performance measures of the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) TIM program were analyzed. Data availability was first assessed to determine whether these performance measures could be calculated. It was determined that crash response data available from the Utah Highway Patrol (UHP) could be used to calculate the performance measures of Incident Management Teams (IMT) and UHP units; however, roadway clearance data were missing. UHP personnel agreed to collect additional data regarding crash roadway clearance for six months of the study. Performance measures of response time (RT), roadway clearance time (RCT), and incident clearance time (ICT) were calculated for responding units at 168 crashes. Using the crash response data from UHP and traffic speed, travel time, and volume data from UDOT databases, 83 of the 163 crashes that met additional criteria were evaluated to determine the volume of traffic affected (AV) by each incident and the associated user cost (EUC). Statistical analyses to determine relationships between different measures such as RT, RCT, ICT, AV, and EUC were conducted to assist UDOT in optimizing the allocation of their IMT resources.
author Hadfield, Mitchell Gregory
author_facet Hadfield, Mitchell Gregory
author_sort Hadfield, Mitchell Gregory
title Analysis of Performance Measures of Traffic Incident Management in Utah
title_short Analysis of Performance Measures of Traffic Incident Management in Utah
title_full Analysis of Performance Measures of Traffic Incident Management in Utah
title_fullStr Analysis of Performance Measures of Traffic Incident Management in Utah
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Performance Measures of Traffic Incident Management in Utah
title_sort analysis of performance measures of traffic incident management in utah
publisher BYU ScholarsArchive
publishDate 2020
url https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8529
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9529&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT hadfieldmitchellgregory analysisofperformancemeasuresoftrafficincidentmanagementinutah
_version_ 1719481165288570880