ESL Students' Reading Behaviors on Multiple-Choice Items at Differing Proficiency Levels: An Eye-Tracking Study

Theorists have been concerned with the overlap of reading and problem solving for at least a century (Thorndike 1917, 1973-1974; Sternberg & Frensch, 2014). Various reading models have been proposed including bottom-up and top-down reading processing (Goodman, 1972; Gough, 1972). In second langu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Escalante Talavera, Juan M
Format: Others
Published: BYU ScholarsArchive 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7424
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8424&context=etd
id ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-8424
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-84242021-09-12T05:01:38Z ESL Students' Reading Behaviors on Multiple-Choice Items at Differing Proficiency Levels: An Eye-Tracking Study Escalante Talavera, Juan M Theorists have been concerned with the overlap of reading and problem solving for at least a century (Thorndike 1917, 1973-1974; Sternberg & Frensch, 2014). Various reading models have been proposed including bottom-up and top-down reading processing (Goodman, 1972; Gough, 1972). In second language literature, theorists have further noted that reading consists of strategic, purposeful, and interactive processes (Grabe, 2009). In test taking situations, problem solving is important because it can compensate for students' language proficiencies. In spite of research showing the use of problem solving in reading, less is known about how learners actually read and problem solve in test-taking situations. This study centers around Khalifa, Weir and colleagues' model for cognitive processing in reading (Weir, Hawkey, Green, Unaldy, & Devi, 2009) in combination with eye-tracking technology in order to examine how ESL readers employ careful and expeditious reading. Data were gathered from 50 students attending a university sponsored Intensive English Program. Participants read eight validated reading comprehension items at varying difficulty levels while their eye movements were recorded. Results indicate that student level may not be a factor in how carefully and expeditiously a student reads. However, statistical analyses suggest that text difficulty may be a factor in how carefully students read. 2018-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7424 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8424&context=etd http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/ Theses and Dissertations BYU ScholarsArchive eye tracking careful reading expeditious reading problem solving reading assessment Arts and Humanities
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic eye tracking
careful reading
expeditious reading
problem solving
reading assessment
Arts and Humanities
spellingShingle eye tracking
careful reading
expeditious reading
problem solving
reading assessment
Arts and Humanities
Escalante Talavera, Juan M
ESL Students' Reading Behaviors on Multiple-Choice Items at Differing Proficiency Levels: An Eye-Tracking Study
description Theorists have been concerned with the overlap of reading and problem solving for at least a century (Thorndike 1917, 1973-1974; Sternberg & Frensch, 2014). Various reading models have been proposed including bottom-up and top-down reading processing (Goodman, 1972; Gough, 1972). In second language literature, theorists have further noted that reading consists of strategic, purposeful, and interactive processes (Grabe, 2009). In test taking situations, problem solving is important because it can compensate for students' language proficiencies. In spite of research showing the use of problem solving in reading, less is known about how learners actually read and problem solve in test-taking situations. This study centers around Khalifa, Weir and colleagues' model for cognitive processing in reading (Weir, Hawkey, Green, Unaldy, & Devi, 2009) in combination with eye-tracking technology in order to examine how ESL readers employ careful and expeditious reading. Data were gathered from 50 students attending a university sponsored Intensive English Program. Participants read eight validated reading comprehension items at varying difficulty levels while their eye movements were recorded. Results indicate that student level may not be a factor in how carefully and expeditiously a student reads. However, statistical analyses suggest that text difficulty may be a factor in how carefully students read.
author Escalante Talavera, Juan M
author_facet Escalante Talavera, Juan M
author_sort Escalante Talavera, Juan M
title ESL Students' Reading Behaviors on Multiple-Choice Items at Differing Proficiency Levels: An Eye-Tracking Study
title_short ESL Students' Reading Behaviors on Multiple-Choice Items at Differing Proficiency Levels: An Eye-Tracking Study
title_full ESL Students' Reading Behaviors on Multiple-Choice Items at Differing Proficiency Levels: An Eye-Tracking Study
title_fullStr ESL Students' Reading Behaviors on Multiple-Choice Items at Differing Proficiency Levels: An Eye-Tracking Study
title_full_unstemmed ESL Students' Reading Behaviors on Multiple-Choice Items at Differing Proficiency Levels: An Eye-Tracking Study
title_sort esl students' reading behaviors on multiple-choice items at differing proficiency levels: an eye-tracking study
publisher BYU ScholarsArchive
publishDate 2018
url https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7424
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8424&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT escalantetalaverajuanm eslstudentsreadingbehaviorsonmultiplechoiceitemsatdifferingproficiencylevelsaneyetrackingstudy
_version_ 1719480441659981824