Tool Life of Various Tool Materials When Friction Spot Welding DP980 Steel

In this study, friction spot welding was used to join DP980 steel sheet. Four different ultra-hard tool materials were used with the objective of determining which tool material produced the highest number of acceptable-strength welds. Three of the tools were composed of various mixtures of polycrys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ridges, Christopher Shane
Format: Others
Published: BYU ScholarsArchive 2011
Subjects:
Q60
Q70
Q80
Online Access:https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2502
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3501&context=etd
id ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-3501
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-35012021-09-12T05:01:08Z Tool Life of Various Tool Materials When Friction Spot Welding DP980 Steel Ridges, Christopher Shane In this study, friction spot welding was used to join DP980 steel sheet. Four different ultra-hard tool materials were used with the objective of determining which tool material produced the highest number of acceptable-strength welds. Three of the tools were composed of various mixtures of polycrystalline cubic Boron Nitride (PCBN), Tungsten, and Rhenium. These materials are referred to herein as Q60, Q70, and Q80, the "Qxx" designation denoting the percentage of the volume of the tool material composed of PCBN. The fourth tool tested was composed entirely of PCBN. The Q70 tool produced approximately 1100 welds of acceptable strength before average weld strength decreased below the acceptable value, and the Q60 tool produced approximately 600 welds of acceptable strength. The Q80 material did not produce any welds with strengths above the acceptable value. However, Q80 produced the greatest number of welds of consistent strength. The PCBN tool, being the hardest, also did not produce any welds of acceptable strength, and failed at 257 welds. This failure is presumed to be a result of a tool/parameter mismatch which caused excessive loads on the tool. This research revealed that the weld parameters and tool materials used in this study will not generally provide for feasibility of implementation in industry. Further advances in weld parameter selection, tool geometry, and tool materials will be necessary in order to make friction spot joining of high strength steels an economically viable option. 2011-03-10T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2502 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3501&context=etd http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/ Theses and Dissertations BYU ScholarsArchive Christopher Ridges DP980 friction spot Q60 Q70 Q80 PCBN Construction Engineering and Management Engineering Science and Materials
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Christopher Ridges
DP980
friction spot
Q60
Q70
Q80
PCBN
Construction Engineering and Management
Engineering Science and Materials
spellingShingle Christopher Ridges
DP980
friction spot
Q60
Q70
Q80
PCBN
Construction Engineering and Management
Engineering Science and Materials
Ridges, Christopher Shane
Tool Life of Various Tool Materials When Friction Spot Welding DP980 Steel
description In this study, friction spot welding was used to join DP980 steel sheet. Four different ultra-hard tool materials were used with the objective of determining which tool material produced the highest number of acceptable-strength welds. Three of the tools were composed of various mixtures of polycrystalline cubic Boron Nitride (PCBN), Tungsten, and Rhenium. These materials are referred to herein as Q60, Q70, and Q80, the "Qxx" designation denoting the percentage of the volume of the tool material composed of PCBN. The fourth tool tested was composed entirely of PCBN. The Q70 tool produced approximately 1100 welds of acceptable strength before average weld strength decreased below the acceptable value, and the Q60 tool produced approximately 600 welds of acceptable strength. The Q80 material did not produce any welds with strengths above the acceptable value. However, Q80 produced the greatest number of welds of consistent strength. The PCBN tool, being the hardest, also did not produce any welds of acceptable strength, and failed at 257 welds. This failure is presumed to be a result of a tool/parameter mismatch which caused excessive loads on the tool. This research revealed that the weld parameters and tool materials used in this study will not generally provide for feasibility of implementation in industry. Further advances in weld parameter selection, tool geometry, and tool materials will be necessary in order to make friction spot joining of high strength steels an economically viable option.
author Ridges, Christopher Shane
author_facet Ridges, Christopher Shane
author_sort Ridges, Christopher Shane
title Tool Life of Various Tool Materials When Friction Spot Welding DP980 Steel
title_short Tool Life of Various Tool Materials When Friction Spot Welding DP980 Steel
title_full Tool Life of Various Tool Materials When Friction Spot Welding DP980 Steel
title_fullStr Tool Life of Various Tool Materials When Friction Spot Welding DP980 Steel
title_full_unstemmed Tool Life of Various Tool Materials When Friction Spot Welding DP980 Steel
title_sort tool life of various tool materials when friction spot welding dp980 steel
publisher BYU ScholarsArchive
publishDate 2011
url https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2502
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3501&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT ridgeschristophershane toollifeofvarioustoolmaterialswhenfrictionspotweldingdp980steel
_version_ 1719480328134852608