Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials

This project analyzed gender and color-specific differences in event-related potentials (ERPs). Previous studies have shown that males process color differently than females. In a recent study, sex differences were found in ERPs during a visual object recognition task. There were higher EEG amplitud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trikha, Abhishek
Format: Others
Published: BYU ScholarsArchive 2010
Subjects:
EEG
Online Access:https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2455
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3454&context=etd
id ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-3454
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-34542019-05-16T03:18:19Z Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials Trikha, Abhishek This project analyzed gender and color-specific differences in event-related potentials (ERPs). Previous studies have shown that males process color differently than females. In a recent study, sex differences were found in ERPs during a visual object recognition task. There were higher EEG amplitudes in females (especially P300) than males. Significant sex and color-specific differences have been found in diseases involving altered dopamine (DA) machinery. Thus, we analyzed differences between ERPs in males vs females during a color task. We also compared the color-specific differences in ERPs between males and females. Males and females participated in EEG recording sessions for 2 color studies during a color-go-no-go task, where two studies examined the gender and color-specific differences in ERPs, respectively. Data from 32 males and 24 females and 21 females and 31 males, respectively, in two color studies demonstrated significant sex-specific differences in ERPs during a color-go-no-go task. Males consistently showed higher EEG amplitudes (particularly P300) than females, which is contradictory to what we demonstrated previously in the object recognition task, indicating different color processing systems in males and females. Regarding color-specific differences, no significant differences were found in P300s between the three colors red, green and blue in males and females when each color was the relevant stimulus, suggesting that color is not a marker for inducing ERPs in normal subjects. These studies will provide the impetus to compare patients having altered DA mechanisms such as in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Parkinson's, or chemical addiction. 2010-12-16T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2455 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3454&context=etd http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/ All Theses and Dissertations BYU ScholarsArchive Event-related potentials color gender EEG Neuroscience and Neurobiology
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Event-related potentials
color
gender
EEG
Neuroscience and Neurobiology
spellingShingle Event-related potentials
color
gender
EEG
Neuroscience and Neurobiology
Trikha, Abhishek
Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials
description This project analyzed gender and color-specific differences in event-related potentials (ERPs). Previous studies have shown that males process color differently than females. In a recent study, sex differences were found in ERPs during a visual object recognition task. There were higher EEG amplitudes in females (especially P300) than males. Significant sex and color-specific differences have been found in diseases involving altered dopamine (DA) machinery. Thus, we analyzed differences between ERPs in males vs females during a color task. We also compared the color-specific differences in ERPs between males and females. Males and females participated in EEG recording sessions for 2 color studies during a color-go-no-go task, where two studies examined the gender and color-specific differences in ERPs, respectively. Data from 32 males and 24 females and 21 females and 31 males, respectively, in two color studies demonstrated significant sex-specific differences in ERPs during a color-go-no-go task. Males consistently showed higher EEG amplitudes (particularly P300) than females, which is contradictory to what we demonstrated previously in the object recognition task, indicating different color processing systems in males and females. Regarding color-specific differences, no significant differences were found in P300s between the three colors red, green and blue in males and females when each color was the relevant stimulus, suggesting that color is not a marker for inducing ERPs in normal subjects. These studies will provide the impetus to compare patients having altered DA mechanisms such as in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Parkinson's, or chemical addiction.
author Trikha, Abhishek
author_facet Trikha, Abhishek
author_sort Trikha, Abhishek
title Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials
title_short Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials
title_full Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials
title_fullStr Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials
title_full_unstemmed Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials
title_sort gender and color specific differences in event related potentials
publisher BYU ScholarsArchive
publishDate 2010
url https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2455
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3454&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT trikhaabhishek genderandcolorspecificdifferencesineventrelatedpotentials
_version_ 1719185207464034304