Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials
This project analyzed gender and color-specific differences in event-related potentials (ERPs). Previous studies have shown that males process color differently than females. In a recent study, sex differences were found in ERPs during a visual object recognition task. There were higher EEG amplitud...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
BYU ScholarsArchive
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2455 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3454&context=etd |
id |
ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-3454 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-BGMYU2-oai-scholarsarchive.byu.edu-etd-34542019-05-16T03:18:19Z Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials Trikha, Abhishek This project analyzed gender and color-specific differences in event-related potentials (ERPs). Previous studies have shown that males process color differently than females. In a recent study, sex differences were found in ERPs during a visual object recognition task. There were higher EEG amplitudes in females (especially P300) than males. Significant sex and color-specific differences have been found in diseases involving altered dopamine (DA) machinery. Thus, we analyzed differences between ERPs in males vs females during a color task. We also compared the color-specific differences in ERPs between males and females. Males and females participated in EEG recording sessions for 2 color studies during a color-go-no-go task, where two studies examined the gender and color-specific differences in ERPs, respectively. Data from 32 males and 24 females and 21 females and 31 males, respectively, in two color studies demonstrated significant sex-specific differences in ERPs during a color-go-no-go task. Males consistently showed higher EEG amplitudes (particularly P300) than females, which is contradictory to what we demonstrated previously in the object recognition task, indicating different color processing systems in males and females. Regarding color-specific differences, no significant differences were found in P300s between the three colors red, green and blue in males and females when each color was the relevant stimulus, suggesting that color is not a marker for inducing ERPs in normal subjects. These studies will provide the impetus to compare patients having altered DA mechanisms such as in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Parkinson's, or chemical addiction. 2010-12-16T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2455 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3454&context=etd http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/ All Theses and Dissertations BYU ScholarsArchive Event-related potentials color gender EEG Neuroscience and Neurobiology |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Event-related potentials color gender EEG Neuroscience and Neurobiology |
spellingShingle |
Event-related potentials color gender EEG Neuroscience and Neurobiology Trikha, Abhishek Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials |
description |
This project analyzed gender and color-specific differences in event-related potentials (ERPs). Previous studies have shown that males process color differently than females. In a recent study, sex differences were found in ERPs during a visual object recognition task. There were higher EEG amplitudes in females (especially P300) than males. Significant sex and color-specific differences have been found in diseases involving altered dopamine (DA) machinery. Thus, we analyzed differences between ERPs in males vs females during a color task. We also compared the color-specific differences in ERPs between males and females. Males and females participated in EEG recording sessions for 2 color studies during a color-go-no-go task, where two studies examined the gender and color-specific differences in ERPs, respectively. Data from 32 males and 24 females and 21 females and 31 males, respectively, in two color studies demonstrated significant sex-specific differences in ERPs during a color-go-no-go task. Males consistently showed higher EEG amplitudes (particularly P300) than females, which is contradictory to what we demonstrated previously in the object recognition task, indicating different color processing systems in males and females. Regarding color-specific differences, no significant differences were found in P300s between the three colors red, green and blue in males and females when each color was the relevant stimulus, suggesting that color is not a marker for inducing ERPs in normal subjects. These studies will provide the impetus to compare patients having altered DA mechanisms such as in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Parkinson's, or chemical addiction. |
author |
Trikha, Abhishek |
author_facet |
Trikha, Abhishek |
author_sort |
Trikha, Abhishek |
title |
Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials |
title_short |
Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials |
title_full |
Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials |
title_fullStr |
Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gender and Color Specific Differences in Event Related Potentials |
title_sort |
gender and color specific differences in event related potentials |
publisher |
BYU ScholarsArchive |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2455 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3454&context=etd |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT trikhaabhishek genderandcolorspecificdifferencesineventrelatedpotentials |
_version_ |
1719185207464034304 |