Event Related Potentials: A Study of the Processing of Gapping Structures in Adolescents
Many questions remain unanswered regarding the intricacies of the human brain, especially with regard to the complexities of language processing. One essential component of human sentence processing is the ability to detect, decipher, and recover from errors in the interpretation of both verbal and...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Others |
| Published: |
BYU ScholarsArchive
2005
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/679 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1678&context=etd |
| Summary: | Many questions remain unanswered regarding the intricacies of the human brain, especially with regard to the complexities of language processing. One essential component of human sentence processing is the ability to detect, decipher, and recover from errors in the interpretation of both verbal and written language. This process of repair of ungrammatical sentences and revision or reinterpretation of ambiguous sentences has been studied extensively in recent years. A variety of tools have been developed, including the use of event-related potentials (ERPs) in order to assess how language is processed and developed, and to help better identify the nature of these processes. The purpose of this study was to compare event-related potential effects of speech processing of spoken and written sentences containing both incorrect and correct semantic and syntactic information. Specifically, sentences containing correct and incorrect gapping structures, each with a "missing" verb, were presented along with other grammatical and ungrammatical sentences in order to elicit and measure the P300, N400, and P600 amplitudes and latencies. The aim was to determine some of the commonalities and differences in these electrophysiological responses via the auditory and visual modalities. Two experiments were conducted with each participant, one in the auditory modality, and one within the visual using two sets of stimuli. Amplitude and topography differences were noted within and between modalities for each of the components (P300, N400, and P600), as well as between stimulus types. Significant findings suggest that in the adolescent population, incorrect gapping structures are generally processed as semantic errors, as evidenced by the N400 response, followed by the P600 response in both the auditory and visual modalities. The exact nature of the P600 component within gapping structures remains unclear. Of particular interest was the involvement of the occipital area of the brain for the processing of gapping structures. Minimal differences were noted overall between adolescents and the adult populations. |
|---|