The value relevance of voluntary disclosure of intangibles : evidence from East Asia

While the traditional accounting model is widely believed to inadequately account for intangibles, managers can voluntarily provide information about them. Based on a sample of companies from East Asia, this thesis investigates the role of voluntary non-financial disclosure about intangibles in a va...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohamad Ariff, Akmalia
Other Authors: Cahan, Steven
Published: ResearchSpace@Auckland 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2292/6638
id ndltd-AUCKLAND-oai-researchspace.auckland.ac.nz-2292-6638
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-AUCKLAND-oai-researchspace.auckland.ac.nz-2292-66382012-12-03T15:03:29ZThe value relevance of voluntary disclosure of intangibles : evidence from East AsiaMohamad Ariff, AkmaliaWhile the traditional accounting model is widely believed to inadequately account for intangibles, managers can voluntarily provide information about them. Based on a sample of companies from East Asia, this thesis investigates the role of voluntary non-financial disclosure about intangibles in a valuation context. Given the proprietary nature of intangibles, the value of the information may not be perceived to be useful by investors. First, this thesis examines the relationship between voluntary disclosure of intangibles and market value. Consistent with the capital market incentives argument, the evidence shows that voluntary disclosure of intangibles contains value relevant information. Second, this thesis investigates the effect of managerial ownership on the value relevance of voluntary disclosure of intangibles. The results show that the value relevance of intangibles is lower in companies with high managerial ownership, supporting the view that high managerial ownership is associated with greater levels of entrenchment. Third, this thesis analyzes the effect of institutional environments on the disclosure of information about intangibles and the subsequent valuation of that information. At comparable levels of managerial ownership, the value relevance of intangibles is greater for companies in countries that have strong institutional environments. This evidence is consistent with strong legal institutions having a positive effect on financial reporting and corporate valuation. Overall, the findings suggest that a strategy of voluntary disclosure could be beneficial in resolving information asymmetry surrounding intangibles. In addition, the effectiveness of voluntary disclosure of intangibles is conditional on the internal corporate governance infrastructure and the external legal environment.ResearchSpace@AucklandCahan, StevenEmanuel, David2011-03-29T21:40:15Z2011-03-29T21:40:15Z2011Thesishttp://hdl.handle.net/2292/6638PhD Thesis - University of AucklandUoA2123921Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwisehttps://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htmCopyright: The author
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description While the traditional accounting model is widely believed to inadequately account for intangibles, managers can voluntarily provide information about them. Based on a sample of companies from East Asia, this thesis investigates the role of voluntary non-financial disclosure about intangibles in a valuation context. Given the proprietary nature of intangibles, the value of the information may not be perceived to be useful by investors. First, this thesis examines the relationship between voluntary disclosure of intangibles and market value. Consistent with the capital market incentives argument, the evidence shows that voluntary disclosure of intangibles contains value relevant information. Second, this thesis investigates the effect of managerial ownership on the value relevance of voluntary disclosure of intangibles. The results show that the value relevance of intangibles is lower in companies with high managerial ownership, supporting the view that high managerial ownership is associated with greater levels of entrenchment. Third, this thesis analyzes the effect of institutional environments on the disclosure of information about intangibles and the subsequent valuation of that information. At comparable levels of managerial ownership, the value relevance of intangibles is greater for companies in countries that have strong institutional environments. This evidence is consistent with strong legal institutions having a positive effect on financial reporting and corporate valuation. Overall, the findings suggest that a strategy of voluntary disclosure could be beneficial in resolving information asymmetry surrounding intangibles. In addition, the effectiveness of voluntary disclosure of intangibles is conditional on the internal corporate governance infrastructure and the external legal environment.
author2 Cahan, Steven
author_facet Cahan, Steven
Mohamad Ariff, Akmalia
author Mohamad Ariff, Akmalia
spellingShingle Mohamad Ariff, Akmalia
The value relevance of voluntary disclosure of intangibles : evidence from East Asia
author_sort Mohamad Ariff, Akmalia
title The value relevance of voluntary disclosure of intangibles : evidence from East Asia
title_short The value relevance of voluntary disclosure of intangibles : evidence from East Asia
title_full The value relevance of voluntary disclosure of intangibles : evidence from East Asia
title_fullStr The value relevance of voluntary disclosure of intangibles : evidence from East Asia
title_full_unstemmed The value relevance of voluntary disclosure of intangibles : evidence from East Asia
title_sort value relevance of voluntary disclosure of intangibles : evidence from east asia
publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/2292/6638
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamadariffakmalia thevaluerelevanceofvoluntarydisclosureofintangiblesevidencefromeastasia
AT mohamadariffakmalia valuerelevanceofvoluntarydisclosureofintangiblesevidencefromeastasia
_version_ 1716393452565954560