|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01896 am a22002053u 4500 |
001 |
99206 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Dash, Sanjeeb
|e author
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Sloan School of Management
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Vielma, Juan Pablo
|e contributor
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Gunluk, Oktay
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Vielma, Juan Pablo
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Computational Experiments with Cross and Crooked Cross Cuts
|
260 |
|
|
|b Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS),
|c 2015-10-08T13:49:41Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99206
|
520 |
|
|
|a In this paper, we study whether cuts obtained from two simplex tableau rows at a time can strengthen the bounds obtained by Gomory mixed-integer (GMI) cuts based on single tableau rows. We also study whether cross and crooked cross cuts, which generalize split cuts, can be separated in an effective manner for practical mixed-integer programs (MIPs) and can yield a nontrivial improvement over the bounds obtained by split cuts. We give positive answers to both these questions for MIPLIB 3.0 problems. Cross cuts are a special case of the t-branch split cuts studied by Li and Richard [Li Y, Richard J-PP (2008) Cook, Kannan and Schrijvers's example revisited. Discrete Optim. 5:724-734]. Split cuts are 1-branch split cuts, and cross cuts are 2-branch split cuts. Crooked cross cuts were introduced by Dash, Günlük, and Lodi [Dash S, Günlük O, Lodi A (2010) MIR closures of polyhedral sets. Math Programming 121:33-60] and were shown to dominate cross cuts by Dash, Günlük, and Molinaro [Dash S, Günlük O, Molinaro M (2012b) On the relative strength of different generalizations of split cuts. IBM Technical Report RC25326, IBM, Yorktown Heights, NY].
|
520 |
|
|
|a United States. Office of Naval Research (Grant N000141110724)
|
546 |
|
|
|a en_US
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t INFORMS Journal on Computing
|