Measuring the return on household enterprise: What matters most for whom?

Return on assets (ROA) of household enterprise is crucial for understanding the productivity of households in developing economies. Yet the definition and measurement of household enterprise ROA remain inconsistent or unclear. We illustrate potential measurement problems with examples from various s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samphantharak, Krislert (Author), Townsend, Robert (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2015-09-22T17:18:16Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01936 am a22002413u 4500
001 98864
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Samphantharak, Krislert  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Townsend, Robert  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Townsend, Robert  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Measuring the return on household enterprise: What matters most for whom? 
260 |c 2015-09-22T17:18:16Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/98864 
520 |a Return on assets (ROA) of household enterprise is crucial for understanding the productivity of households in developing economies. Yet the definition and measurement of household enterprise ROA remain inconsistent or unclear. We illustrate potential measurement problems with examples from various surveys. We take advantage of a detailed household survey and analyze what matters and for whom. The three issues that matter most for measurement of household enterprise ROA are the choice of accrual versus cash income, the treatment of household labor in enterprise income, and the treatment of non-factor income. This sensitivity matters most for a poorer region dominated by cultivation relative to a richer region with non-farm enterprises. Though the choice between accrued and cash income matters less when the frequency of the data declines, there remains high sensitivity in annualized data. We provide recommendations on how to improve the survey questionnaires for more accurate measurement in field research. 
520 |a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) 
520 |a Templeton Foundation 
520 |a University of Chicago. Consortium on Financial Systems and Poverty 
520 |a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Journal of Development Economics