A Path Forward for Low Carbon Power from Biomass

The two major pathways for energy utilization from biomass are conversion to a liquid fuel (i.e., biofuels) or conversion to electricity (i.e., biopower). In the United States (US), biomass policy has focused on biofuels. However, this paper will investigate three options for biopower: low co-firing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cuellar, Amanda (Author), Herzog, Howard J. (Contributor)
Other Authors: MIT Energy Initiative (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG, 2015-05-29T12:31:06Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01858 am a22001813u 4500
001 97102
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Cuellar, Amanda  |e author 
100 1 0 |a MIT Energy Initiative  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Herzog, Howard J.  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Herzog, Howard J.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A Path Forward for Low Carbon Power from Biomass 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2015-05-29T12:31:06Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97102 
520 |a The two major pathways for energy utilization from biomass are conversion to a liquid fuel (i.e., biofuels) or conversion to electricity (i.e., biopower). In the United States (US), biomass policy has focused on biofuels. However, this paper will investigate three options for biopower: low co-firing (co-firing scenarios refer to combusting a given percentage of biomass with coal) (5%-10% biomass), medium co-firing (15%-20% biomass), and dedicated biomass firing (100% biomass). We analyze the economic and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions impact of each of these options, with and without CO[subscript 2] capture and storage (CCS). Our analysis shows that in the absence of land use change emissions, all biomass co-combustion scenarios result in a decrease in GHG emissions over coal generation alone. The two biggest barriers to biopower are concerns about carbon neutrality of biomass fuels and the high cost compared to today's electricity prices. This paper recommends two policy actions. First, the need to define sustainability criteria and initiate a certification process so that biomass providers have a fixed set of guidelines to determine whether their feedstocks qualify as renewable energy sources. Second, the need for a consistent, predictable policy that provides the economic incentives to make biopower economically attractive. 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Energies