Nonliteral understanding of number words

One of the most puzzling and important facts about communication is that people do not always mean what they say; speakers often use imprecise, exaggerated, or otherwise literally false descriptions to communicate experiences and attitudes. Here, we focus on the nonliteral interpretation of number w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bergen, Leon (Contributor), Kao, Justine T. (Author), Wu, Jean Y. (Author), Goodman, Noah D. (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), 2015-03-03T17:32:09Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01850 am a22002173u 4500
001 95752
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Bergen, Leon  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Bergen, Leon  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Kao, Justine T.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wu, Jean Y.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Goodman, Noah D.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Nonliteral understanding of number words 
260 |b National Academy of Sciences (U.S.),   |c 2015-03-03T17:32:09Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/95752 
520 |a One of the most puzzling and important facts about communication is that people do not always mean what they say; speakers often use imprecise, exaggerated, or otherwise literally false descriptions to communicate experiences and attitudes. Here, we focus on the nonliteral interpretation of number words, in particular hyperbole (interpreting unlikely numbers as exaggerated and conveying affect) and pragmatic halo (interpreting round numbers imprecisely). We provide a computational model of number interpretation as social inference regarding the communicative goal, meaning, and affective subtext of an utterance. We show that our model predicts humans' interpretation of number words with high accuracy. Our model is the first to our knowledge to incorporate principles of communication and empirically measured background knowledge to quantitatively predict hyperbolic and pragmatic halo effects in number interpretation. This modeling framework provides a unified approach to nonliteral language understanding more generally. 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.). Graduate Research Fellowship Program 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America