|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02589 am a22002293u 4500 |
001 |
89830 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Meire, Dieter W. S. A.
|e author
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Kondziolka, John M.
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Nepf, Heidi
|e contributor
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Kondziolka, John M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Nepf, Heidi
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Interaction between neighboring vegetation patches: Impact on flow and deposition
|
260 |
|
|
|b American Geophysical Union (Wiley platform),
|c 2014-09-19T13:30:09Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/89830
|
520 |
|
|
|a Flow and sedimentation around patches of vegetation are important to landscape evolution, and a better understanding of these processes would facilitate more effective river restoration and wetlands engineering. In wetlands and channels, patches of vegetation are rarely isolated and neighboring patches influence one another during their development. In this experimental study, an adjacent pair of emergent vegetation patches were modeled by circular arrays of cylinders with their centers aligned in a direction that was perpendicular to the flow direction. The flow and deposition patterns behind the pair of patches were measured for two stem densities and for different patch separations (gap widths). The wake pattern immediately behind each individual patch was similar to that observed behind an isolated patch, with a velocity minimum directly behind each patch that produced a well-defined region of enhanced deposition in line with the patch. For all gap widths (Δ), the velocity on the centerline between the patches (U[subscript c]) was elevated to a peak velocity U[subscript max] that persisted over a distance L[subscript j]. Although U[subscript max] was not a function of Δ, L[subscript j] decreased with decreasing Δ. Beyond L[subscript j], the wakes merged and U[subscript c] decayed to a local minimum. The merging of wakes and associated velocity minimum produced a local maximum in deposition downstream from and on the centerline between the patches. If this secondary region of enhanced deposition promotes new vegetation growth, the increased drag on the centerline could slow velocity between the upstream patch pair, leading to conditions favorable to their merger.
|
520 |
|
|
|a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant OCE 0751358)
|
520 |
|
|
|a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant EAR 0738352)
|
546 |
|
|
|a en_US
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t Water Resources Research
|