|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01746 am a22002413u 4500 |
001 |
88610 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Leung, Debbie W.
|e author
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Theoretical Physics
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Nuclear Science
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Li, Ke
|e contributor
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Li, Ke
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Smith, Graeme
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Smolin, John A.
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Maximal Privacy without Coherence
|
260 |
|
|
|b American Physical Society,
|c 2014-08-08T14:35:39Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88610
|
520 |
|
|
|a Privacy is a fundamental feature of quantum mechanics. A coherently transmitted quantum state is inherently private. Remarkably, coherent quantum communication is not a prerequisite for privacy: there are quantum channels that are too noisy to transmit any quantum information reliably that can nevertheless send private classical information. Here, we ask how much private classical information a channel can transmit if it has little quantum capacity. We present a class of channels N[subscript d] with input dimension d[superscript 2], quantum capacity Q(N[subscript d]) ≤ 1, and private capacity P(N[subscript d])= log d. These channels asymptotically saturate an interesting inequality P(N) ≤ (1/2)[log d[subscript A] + Q(N)] for any channel N with input dimension d[subscript A] and capture the essence of privacy stripped of the confounding influence of coherence.
|
520 |
|
|
|a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant CCF-1110961)
|
520 |
|
|
|a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant CCF-1111382)
|
546 |
|
|
|a en
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t Physical Review Letters
|