Quantum Adiabatic Algorithms, Small Gaps, and Different Paths

• Main Authors: Farhi, Edward (Contributor), Goldstone, Jeffrey (Contributor), Gosset, David Nicholas (Contributor), Gutmann, Sam (Author), Meyer, Harvey B. (Contributor), Shor, Peter W. (Contributor)
• Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Theoretical Physics (Contributor), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematics (Contributor), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics (Contributor)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Rinton Press, 2014-07-15T13:36:37Z.
• Subjects: Article
• Online Access: Get fulltext

We construct a set of instances of 3SAT which are not solved efficiently using the simplestquantum adiabatic algorithm. These instances are obtained by picking randomclauses all consistent with two disparate planted solutions and then penalizing one ofthem with a single additional clause. We argue that by randomly modifying the beginningHamiltonian, one obtains (with substantial probability) an adiabatic path thatremoves this difficulty. This suggests that the quantum adiabatic algorithm should ingeneral be run on each instance with many different random paths leading to the problemHamiltonian. We do not know whether this trick will help for a random instance of3SAT (as opposed to an instance from the particular set we consider), especially if theinstance has an exponential number of disparate assignments that violate few clauses.We use a continuous imaginary time Quantum Monte Carlo algorithm in a novel way tonumerically investigate the ground state as well as the first excited state of our system.Our arguments are supplemented by Quantum Monte Carlo data from simulations withup to 150 spins.
United States. Dept. of Energy (Cooperative Research Agreement DE-FG02-94ER40818)
W. M. Keck Foundation Center for Extreme Quantum Information Theory
U.S. Army Research Laboratory (Grant W911NF-09-1-0438)
National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant CCF-0829421)