A Study of Student Design Team Behaviors in Complex System Design

Large-scale engineering systems require design teams to balance complex sets of considerations using a wide range of design and decision-making skills. Formal, computational approaches for optimizing complex systems offer strategies for arriving at optimal solutions in situations where system integr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Honda, Tomonori (Contributor), Austin-Breneman, Jesse Lauren (Contributor), Yang, Maria (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering (Contributor), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ASME International, 2014-04-14T16:23:58Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02218 am a22002773u 4500
001 86150
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Honda, Tomonori  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Yang, Maria  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Austin-Breneman, Jesse Lauren  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Honda, Tomonori  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Yang, Maria  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Austin-Breneman, Jesse Lauren  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yang, Maria  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A Study of Student Design Team Behaviors in Complex System Design 
260 |b ASME International,   |c 2014-04-14T16:23:58Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/86150 
520 |a Large-scale engineering systems require design teams to balance complex sets of considerations using a wide range of design and decision-making skills. Formal, computational approaches for optimizing complex systems offer strategies for arriving at optimal solutions in situations where system integration and design optimization are well-formulated. However, observation of design practice suggests engineers may be poorly prepared for this type of design. Four graduate student teams completed a distributed, complex system design task. Analysis of the teams' design histories suggests three categories of suboptimal approaches: global rather than local searches, optimizing individual design parameters separately, and sequential rather than concurrent optimization strategies. Teams focused strongly on individual subsystems rather than system-level optimization, and did not use the provided system gradient indicator to understand how changes in individual subsystems impacted the overall system. This suggests the need for curriculum to teach engineering students how to appropriately integrate systems as a whole. 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Award CMMI-0830134) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Award CMMI-0900255) 
520 |a Ford Foundation (Predoctoral Fellowship) 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Journal of Mechanical Design