A fast butterfly algorithm for generalized Radon transforms

Generalized Radon transforms, such as the hyperbolic Radon transform, cannot be implemented as efficiently in the frequency domain as convolutions, thus limiting their use in seismic data processing. We have devised a fast butterfly algorithm for the hyperbolic Radon transform. The basic idea is to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hu, Jingwei (Author), Fomel, Sergey (Author), Demanet, Laurent (Contributor), Ying, Lexing (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematics (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2013-10-16T14:55:03Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01605 am a22002173u 4500
001 81405
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hu, Jingwei  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematics  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Demanet, Laurent  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Fomel, Sergey  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Demanet, Laurent  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ying, Lexing  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A fast butterfly algorithm for generalized Radon transforms 
260 |b Society of Exploration Geophysicists,   |c 2013-10-16T14:55:03Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81405 
520 |a Generalized Radon transforms, such as the hyperbolic Radon transform, cannot be implemented as efficiently in the frequency domain as convolutions, thus limiting their use in seismic data processing. We have devised a fast butterfly algorithm for the hyperbolic Radon transform. The basic idea is to reformulate the transform as an oscillatory integral operator and to construct a blockwise low-rank approximation of the kernel function. The overall structure follows the Fourier integral operator butterfly algorithm. For 2D data, the algorithm runs in complexity O(N[superscript 2] log N), where N depends on the maximum frequency and offset in the data set and the range of parameters (intercept time and slowness) in the model space. From a series of studies, we found that this algorithm can be significantly more efficient than the conventional time-domain integration. 
520 |a Texas Consortium for Computational Seismology 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Geophysics