|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01117 am a22001693u 4500 |
| 001 |
73563 |
| 042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Skow, Bradford
|e author
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
|e contributor
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Skow, Bradford
|e contributor
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a More on Haecceitism and Possible Worlds
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b Wiley Blackwell (Blackwell Publishing),
|c 2012-10-03T15:23:12Z.
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73563
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Anti-haecceitism is the thesis that the universe could not be nonqualitatively different without being qualitatively different. Haecceitism is the denial of anti-haecceitism.1 In "Haecceitism, Anti-Haecceitism, and Possible Worlds" (Skow 2008), I argued that there are no nontendentious definitions of "haecceitism" and "anti-haecceitism" using possible-worlds talk. For any candidate definition of "anti-haecceitism" that uses possible-worlds talk, there is some theory of possible worlds relative to which that definition is not equivalent to anti-haecceitism.
|
| 546 |
|
|
|a en_US
|
| 655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
| 773 |
|
|
|t Analytic Philosophy
|
