Born in an infinite universe: A cosmological interpretation of quantum mechanics

We study the quantum measurement problem in the context of an infinite, statistically uniform space, as could be generated by eternal inflation. It has recently been argued that when identical copies of a quantum measurement system exist, the standard projection operators and Born rule method for ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aguirre, Anthony (Author), Tegmark, Max Erik (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics (Contributor), MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society (APS), 2012-03-23T19:03:37Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 03548 am a22003253u 4500
001 69847
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Aguirre, Anthony  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Tegmark, Max Erik  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Tegmark, Max Erik  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Tegmark, Max Erik  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Born in an infinite universe: A cosmological interpretation of quantum mechanics 
260 |b American Physical Society (APS),   |c 2012-03-23T19:03:37Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/69847 
520 |a We study the quantum measurement problem in the context of an infinite, statistically uniform space, as could be generated by eternal inflation. It has recently been argued that when identical copies of a quantum measurement system exist, the standard projection operators and Born rule method for calculating probabilities must be supplemented by estimates of relative frequencies of observers. We argue that an infinite space actually renders the Born rule redundant, by physically realizing all outcomes of a quantum measurement in different regions, with relative frequencies given by the square of the wave-function amplitudes. Our formal argument hinges on properties of what we term the quantum confusion operator, which projects onto the Hilbert subspace where the Born rule fails, and we comment on its relation to the oft-discussed quantum frequency operator. This analysis unifies the classical and quantum levels of parallel universes that have been discussed in the literature, and has implications for several issues in quantum measurement theory. Replacing the standard hypothetical ensemble of measurements repeated ad infinitum by a concrete decohered spatial collection of experiments carried out in different distant regions of space provides a natural context for a statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics. It also shows how, even for a single measurement, probabilities may be interpreted as relative frequencies in unitary (Everettian) quantum mechanics. We also argue that after discarding a zero-norm part of the wave function, the remainder consists of a superposition of indistinguishable terms, so that arguably "collapse" of the wave function is irrelevant, and the "many worlds" of Everett's interpretation are unified into one. Finally, the analysis suggests a "cosmological interpretation" of quantum theory in which the wave function describes the actual spatial collection of identical quantum systems, and quantum uncertainty is attributable to the observer's inability to self-locate in this collection. 
520 |a United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Grant No. NAG5-11099) 
520 |a United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Grant No. NNG 05G40G) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant No. AST-0607597) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant No. AST-0708534) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant No. AST-0908848) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant No. PHY-0855425) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant No. PHY-0757912) 
520 |a Templeton Foundation (Foundational Questions in Physics and Cosmology grant) 
520 |a David & Lucile Packard Foundation 
520 |a Research Corporation 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Physical Review D