On the Ungrammaticality of Remnant Movement in the Derivation of Greenberg's Universal 20

We propose an analysis that derives Cinque's (2005) typology of linear orders involving a demonstrative, numeral, adjective, and noun through four Optimality Theory constraints requiring leftward alignment of these items. We show that remnant movement is ungrammatical whenever it produces unive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steddy, Samuel Joseph (Contributor), Samek-Lodovici, Vieri (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MIT Press, 2011-11-07T20:47:14Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01440 am a22001933u 4500
001 66959
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Steddy, Samuel Joseph  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Steddy, Samuel Joseph  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Steddy, Samuel Joseph  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Samek-Lodovici, Vieri  |e author 
245 0 0 |a On the Ungrammaticality of Remnant Movement in the Derivation of Greenberg's Universal 20 
260 |b MIT Press,   |c 2011-11-07T20:47:14Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/66959 
520 |a We propose an analysis that derives Cinque's (2005) typology of linear orders involving a demonstrative, numeral, adjective, and noun through four Optimality Theory constraints requiring leftward alignment of these items. We show that remnant movement is ungrammatical whenever it produces universally suboptimal alignments, compared with remnant-movement-free structures. Any movement is permitted, but only the best alignment configurations surface as grammatical. We also show that Cinque's original analysis must encode the structural derivations of all attested orders as parametric values of the associated languages. Our analysis need not make similar structural stipulations, as the different attested structures emerge from constraint reranking. 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Linguistic Inquiry