|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01928 am a22002533u 4500 |
001 |
62559 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Kreidl, Olivier Patrick
|e author
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Tsitsiklis, John N.
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Kreidl, Olivier Patrick
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Tsitsiklis, John N.
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Zoumpoulis, Spyridon Ilias
|e contributor
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Tsitsiklis, John N.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Zoumpoulis, Spyridon Ilias
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a On Decentralized Detection with Partial Information Sharing among Sensors
|
260 |
|
|
|b Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,
|c 2011-04-28T20:00:25Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/62559
|
520 |
|
|
|a We study a decentralized detection architecture in which each of a set of sensors transmits a highly compressed summary of its observations (a binary message) to a fusion center, which then decides on one of two alternative hypotheses. In contrast to the star (or "parallel") architecture considered in most of the literature, we allow a subset of the sensors to both transmit their messages to the fusion center and to also broadcast them to the remaining sensors. We focus on the following architectural question: Is there a significant performance improvement when we allow such a message broadcast? We consider the error exponent (asymptotically, in the limit of a large number of sensors) for the Neyman-Pearson formulation of the detection problem. We prove that the sharing of messages does not improve the optimal error exponent.
|
520 |
|
|
|a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant ECCS-0701623)
|
546 |
|
|
|a en_US
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t IEEE transactions on signal processing
|