|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01145 am a22001933u 4500 |
| 001 |
61697 |
| 042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Cuthbert, Michael Scott
|e author
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Cuthbert, Michael Scott
|e contributor
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Cuthbert, Michael Scott
|e contributor
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Der Mensuralkodex St. Emmeram: Faksimile der Handschrift Clm 14274 der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek München - Review for Notes
|
| 246 |
3 |
3 |
|a ST. EMMERAM FACSIMILE
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b Music Library Association,
|c 2011-03-15T13:13:45Z.
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61697
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Book Review
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a A new facsimile of a half-millennium-old manuscript needs to know who its audience will be. Reproductions of stunningly beautiful sources, such as the Squarcialupi Codex or the newly available Chansonnier Cordiforme, need little justification, for they entice the scholar, student, and buyer with a sheer brilliance unknowable in modern transcription. But what of more mundane, everyday manuscripts of the Middle Ages and Renaissance? How do they justify their high price tags and large shelf spaces?
|
| 546 |
|
|
|a en_US
|
| 655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
| 773 |
|
|
|t Notes
|
