On the Meaning of the Question "How Fast Does Time Pass?"

In this paper I distinguish interpretations of the question ''How fast does time pass?'' that are important for the debate over the reality of objective becoming from interpretations that are not. Then I discuss how one theory that incorporates objective becoming-the moving spotl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Skow, Bradford (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer, 2011-03-07T23:13:32Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01278 am a22001813u 4500
001 61624
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Skow, Bradford  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Skow, Bradford  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Skow, Bradford  |e contributor 
245 0 0 |a On the Meaning of the Question "How Fast Does Time Pass?" 
260 |b Springer,   |c 2011-03-07T23:13:32Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61624 
520 |a In this paper I distinguish interpretations of the question ''How fast does time pass?'' that are important for the debate over the reality of objective becoming from interpretations that are not. Then I discuss how one theory that incorporates objective becoming-the moving spotlight theory of time-answers this question. It turns out that there are several ways to formulate the moving spotlight theory of time. One formulation says that time passes but it makes no sense to ask how fast; another formulation says that time passes at one second per supersecond; and a third says that time passes at one second per second. I defend the intelligibility of this final version of the theory. 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Philosophical Studies