Should We Have Automatic Triggers for Unemployment Benefit Duration and How Costly Would They Be?

<jats:p> We model automatic trigger policies for unemployment insurance by simulating a weekly panel of individual labor market histories, grouped by state. We reach three conclusions: (i) policies designed to trigger immediately at the onset of a recession result in benefit extensions that oc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chodorow-Reich, Gabriel (Author), Ganong, Peter (Author), Gruber, Jonathan (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Economic Association, 2022-08-29T15:47:21Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01213 am a22001813u 4500
001 144482
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Chodorow-Reich, Gabriel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ganong, Peter  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gruber, Jonathan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Should We Have Automatic Triggers for Unemployment Benefit Duration and How Costly Would They Be? 
260 |b American Economic Association,   |c 2022-08-29T15:47:21Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/144482 
520 |a <jats:p> We model automatic trigger policies for unemployment insurance by simulating a weekly panel of individual labor market histories, grouped by state. We reach three conclusions: (i) policies designed to trigger immediately at the onset of a recession result in benefit extensions that occur in less sick labor markets than the historical average for benefit extensions, (ii) the ad hoc extensions in the 2001 and 2007-2009 recessions compare favorably ex post to common proposals for automatic triggers, and (iii) compared to ex post policy, the cost of common proposals for automatic triggers is close to zero. </jats:p> 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t 10.1257/pandp.20221075 
773 |t AEA Papers and Proceedings