Beyond "fake news": Analytic thinking and the detection of false and hyperpartisan news headlines
<p>Why is misleading partisan content believed and shared? An influential account posits that political partisanship pervasively biases reasoning, such that engaging in analytic thinking exacerbates motivated reasoning and, in turn, the acceptance of hyperpartisan content. Alternatively, it ma...
Main Authors: | Ross, Robert M (Author), Rand, David Gertler (Author), Pennycook, Gordon (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Center for Open Science,
2022-08-08T16:25:27Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get fulltext |
Similar Items
-
Beyond “fake news”:
Analytic thinking and the detection of false and hyperpartisan news
headlines
by: Robert M. Ross, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines
by: Rand, David Gertler
Published: (2021) -
The Implied Truth Effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of Fake News Headlines Increases Perceived Accuracy of Headlines Without Warnings
by: Pennycook, Gordon, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news
by: Martel, Cameron, et al.
Published: (2020) -
The Psychology of Fake News
by: Pennycook, Gordon, et al.
Published: (2022)